PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRGWX vs. VITAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VRGWX vs. VITAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX) and Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund Admiral Shares (VITAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRGWX achieves a -0.51% return, which is significantly lower than VITAX's 20.86% return. Over the past 10 years, VRGWX has underperformed VITAX with an annualized return of 17.69%, while VITAX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.98% annualized return.


VRGWX

1D
2.96%
1M
-3.22%
6M
1.02%
YTD
-0.51%
1Y
9.23%
3Y*
18.85%
5Y*
12.46%
10Y*
17.69%
ALL TIME*
16.56%

VITAX

1D
5.05%
1M
-1.00%
6M
21.80%
YTD
20.86%
1Y
35.33%
3Y*
26.67%
5Y*
17.91%
10Y*
23.98%
ALL TIME*
14.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

VRGWX vs. VITAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VRGWX
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
-0.51%18.32%33.25%42.65%-29.18%32.42%38.38%36.30%-1.59%30.11%
VITAX
Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund Admiral Shares
20.86%21.78%29.26%52.69%-29.67%30.36%45.93%48.72%2.51%37.07%

Correlation

The correlation between VRGWX and VITAX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.95

The correlation between VRGWX and VITAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRGWX vs. VITAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VRGWX
VRGWX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
VRGWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRGWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRGWX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
VRGWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRGWX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

VITAX
VITAX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
VITAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VITAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VITAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
VITAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VITAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VRGWX vs. VITAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX) and Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund Admiral Shares (VITAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VRGWXVITAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.22

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.45

1.93

-1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.34

5.21

-3.87

VRGWX vs. VITAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRGWX Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the VITAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRGWX and VITAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VRGWX vs. VITAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRGWX drawdown since its inception was -32.70%, smaller than the maximum VITAX drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRGWX and VITAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRGWXVITAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.70%

-54.81%

+22.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.19%

-16.38%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.44%

-27.38%

+3.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.70%

-35.10%

+2.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.70%

-35.10%

+2.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.72%

-9.58%

+0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.88%

-8.01%

+3.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.38%

6.05%

-0.67%

Volatility

VRGWX vs. VITAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX) is 6.40%, while Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund Admiral Shares (VITAX) has a volatility of 8.62%. This indicates that VRGWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VITAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRGWXVITAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.40%

8.62%

-2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.06%

20.26%

-6.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.50%

24.34%

-6.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.94%

26.04%

-4.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.29%

25.12%

-3.83%

VRGWX vs. VITAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRGWX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VITAX's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VRGWX vs. VITAX - Dividend Comparison

VRGWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, more than VITAX's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VITAX
Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund Admiral Shares
0.38%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.63%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%
VRGWX
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.49%0.35%0.56%0.71%0.99%4.18%0.77%1.03%1.22%1.22%1.52%1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, VRGWX and VITAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VITAX has higher volatility (8.62%) compared to VRGWX (6.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRGWX dropped -32.70% vs VITAX's -54.81%.

VITAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRGWX and VITAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer