VRA vs. PBPB

In the year-to-date period, VRA achieves a -49.62% return, which is significantly lower than PBPB's -7.43% return. Over the past 10 years, VRA has underperformed PBPB with an annualized return of -17.77%, while PBPB has yielded a comparatively higher -4.87% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vera Bradley, Inc. (VRA) and Potbelly Corporation (PBPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current VRA Sharpe Ratio is -1.14, which is lower than the PBPB Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRA and PBPB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither VRA nor PBPB has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum VRA drawdown since its inception was -96.56%, roughly equal to the maximum PBPB drawdown of -94.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRA and PBPB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Vera Bradley, Inc. (VRA) has a higher volatility of 26.73% compared to Potbelly Corporation (PBPB) at 15.76%. This indicates that VRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBPB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vera Bradley, Inc. and Potbelly Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.