PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
VPV vs. SLG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


VPVSLG
YTD Return15.67%78.11%
1Y Return26.87%175.22%
3Y Return (Ann)-2.01%8.56%
5Y Return (Ann)1.08%4.91%
10Y Return (Ann)2.96%1.13%
Sharpe Ratio2.873.63
Sortino Ratio4.514.26
Omega Ratio1.661.51
Calmar Ratio0.942.47
Martin Ratio19.9635.84
Ulcer Index1.35%4.54%
Daily Std Dev9.36%44.86%
Max Drawdown-45.33%-94.02%
Current Drawdown-9.58%-5.98%

Fundamentals


VPVSLG
Market Cap$264.03M$5.34B
EPS$0.94-$2.55
PEG Ratio0.000.95
Total Revenue (TTM)$14.97M$776.37M
Gross Profit (TTM)$12.29M$416.87M
EBITDA (TTM)$18.24M$420.38M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between VPV and SLG is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

VPV vs. SLG - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, VPV achieves a 15.67% return, which is significantly lower than SLG's 78.11% return. Over the past 10 years, VPV has outperformed SLG with an annualized return of 2.96%, while SLG has yielded a comparatively lower 1.13% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
11.57%
43.92%
VPV
SLG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

VPV vs. SLG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Pennsylvania Value Municipal Income Trust (VPV) and SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VPV
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VPV, currently valued at 2.87, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.87
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VPV, currently valued at 4.51, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.51
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VPV, currently valued at 1.66, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.66
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VPV, currently valued at 0.94, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.94
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VPV, currently valued at 19.96, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0019.96
SLG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SLG, currently valued at 3.63, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.63
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SLG, currently valued at 4.26, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.26
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SLG, currently valued at 1.51, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.51
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SLG, currently valued at 2.47, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.47
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SLG, currently valued at 35.84, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0035.84

VPV vs. SLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VPV Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is comparable to the SLG Sharpe Ratio of 3.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VPV and SLG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.87
3.63
VPV
SLG

Dividends

VPV vs. SLG - Dividend Comparison

VPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, more than SLG's 3.92% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
VPV
Invesco Pennsylvania Value Municipal Income Trust
4.99%3.86%5.51%4.29%4.59%4.85%5.94%5.14%6.00%6.09%6.48%7.41%
SLG
SL Green Realty Corp.
3.92%7.15%10.95%8.49%7.82%3.74%4.16%3.11%2.73%2.23%1.77%1.61%

Drawdowns

VPV vs. SLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VPV drawdown since its inception was -45.33%, smaller than the maximum SLG drawdown of -94.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPV and SLG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-9.58%
-5.98%
VPV
SLG

Volatility

VPV vs. SLG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Pennsylvania Value Municipal Income Trust (VPV) is 2.55%, while SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG) has a volatility of 10.75%. This indicates that VPV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.55%
10.75%
VPV
SLG

Financials

VPV vs. SLG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Invesco Pennsylvania Value Municipal Income Trust and SL Green Realty Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items