PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VPV vs. SLG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VPV vs. SLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Pennsylvania Value Municipal Income Trust (VPV) and SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VPV having a 10.77% return and SLG slightly higher at 11.13%. Over the past 10 years, VPV has outperformed SLG with an annualized return of 3.00%, while SLG has yielded a comparatively lower -2.08% annualized return.


VPV

1D
0.00%
1M
3.46%
YTD
10.77%
6M
11.51%
1Y
21.42%
3Y*
11.39%
5Y*
2.17%
10Y*
3.00%

SLG

1D
1.07%
1M
15.78%
YTD
11.13%
6M
14.68%
1Y
-17.13%
3Y*
36.21%
5Y*
-3.69%
10Y*
-2.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VPV vs. SLG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VPV
Invesco Pennsylvania Value Municipal Income Trust
10.77%9.96%9.04%6.10%-26.32%14.57%1.46%19.47%1.31%5.14%
SLG
SL Green Realty Corp.
11.13%-29.03%58.26%48.75%-50.94%22.86%-29.14%20.96%-18.80%-3.25%

Correlation

The correlation between VPV and SLG is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 1997

0.09

The correlation between VPV and SLG shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.22 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VPV:

$199.63M

SLG:

$3.87B

EPS

VPV:

$1.01

SLG:

-$2.05

PS Ratio

VPV:

6.10

SLG:

3.86

PB Ratio

VPV:

1.01

SLG:

1.17

Total Revenue (TTM)

VPV:

$32.74M

SLG:

$993.51M

Gross Profit (TTM)

VPV:

$24.84M

SLG:

$662.81M

EBITDA (TTM)

VPV:

$22.21M

SLG:

$547.76M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VPV vs. SLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VPV
VPV Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
VPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPV Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
VPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPV Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

SLG
SLG Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLG Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
SLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLG Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VPV vs. SLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Pennsylvania Value Municipal Income Trust (VPV) and SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VPVSLGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

0.95

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

-0.38

+3.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.20

-0.64

+10.83

VPV vs. SLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VPV Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the SLG Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VPV and SLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VPV vs. SLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VPV drawdown since its inception was -45.21%, smaller than the maximum SLG drawdown of -94.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPV and SLG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VPVSLGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.21%

-94.02%

+48.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.19%

-45.40%

+38.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.46%

-53.91%

+41.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.08%

-74.27%

+41.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.08%

-77.70%

+44.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.30%

-36.36%

+34.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.46%

-27.45%

+18.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

26.90%

-24.79%

Volatility

VPV vs. SLG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Pennsylvania Value Municipal Income Trust (VPV) is 3.91%, while SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG) has a volatility of 10.51%. This indicates that VPV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VPVSLGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.91%

10.51%

-6.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.79%

28.27%

-19.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.33%

37.94%

-27.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.40%

43.65%

-33.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.04%

42.33%

-30.29%

Dividends

VPV vs. SLG - Dividend Comparison

VPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.17%, more than SLG's 4.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLG
SL Green Realty Corp.
4.32%6.18%4.43%7.15%10.94%5.09%7.81%3.74%4.16%3.11%2.73%2.23%
VPV
Invesco Pennsylvania Value Municipal Income Trust
7.17%7.65%6.07%3.81%5.48%4.29%4.61%4.85%5.94%5.15%6.00%6.09%

Financials

VPV vs. SLG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Invesco Pennsylvania Value Municipal Income Trust and SL Green Realty Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-50.00M0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M20222023202420252026
7.19M
253.08M
(VPV) Total Revenue
(SLG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


VPV and SLG have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLG has higher volatility (10.51%) compared to VPV (3.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VPV dropped -45.21% vs SLG's -94.02%.

VPV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VPV and SLG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer