VPU vs. XLV
VPU (Vanguard Utilities ETF) and XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VPU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Utilities 25/50 Index, while XLV is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VPU returned 9.30%/yr vs 10.40%/yr for XLV. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VPU charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLV.
Performance
VPU vs. XLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VPU achieves a 8.52% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's 1.39% return. Over the past 10 years, VPU has underperformed XLV with an annualized return of 9.30%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively higher 10.40% annualized return.
VPU
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 8.52%
- 6M
- 8.11%
- 1Y
- 16.97%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 10.47%
- 10Y*
- 9.30%
XLV
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 5.26%
- YTD
- 1.39%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 18.26%
- 3Y*
- 7.63%
- 5Y*
- 6.07%
- 10Y*
- 10.40%
VPU vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VPU Vanguard Utilities ETF | 8.52% | 16.46% | 23.04% | -7.45% | 1.06% | 17.40% | -0.74% | 24.89% | 4.38% | 12.44% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.39% | 14.50% | 2.47% | 2.07% | -2.08% | 26.04% | 13.30% | 20.45% | 6.28% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between VPU and XLV is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VPU and XLV has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VPU vs. XLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VPU
XLV
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
VPU
XLV
-
Energy
VPU
XLV
-
Industrials
VPU
XLV
-
Basic Materials
VPU
-
XLV
-
Communication Services
VPU
-
XLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
VPU
-
XLV
-
Consumer Defensive
VPU
-
XLV
-
Financial Services
VPU
-
XLV
-
Healthcare
VPU
-
XLV
Real Estate
VPU
-
XLV
-
Technology
VPU
-
XLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VPU vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank
VPU
XLV
VPU vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VPU | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.21 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 1.75 | +0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.07 | 4.13 | -0.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VPU vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VPU drawdown since its inception was -46.31%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPU and XLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VPU | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.31% | -39.17% | -7.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -10.47% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.34% | -17.11% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.15% | -17.11% | -8.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.42% | -28.40% | -8.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.46% | -2.02% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.78% | -7.11% | -0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.18% | 4.43% | -0.25% |
Volatility
VPU vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) have volatilities of 5.22% and 5.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VPU | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.22% | 5.25% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.47% | 10.76% | +0.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.42% | 15.13% | -0.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 14.79% | +2.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.14% | 16.57% | +2.57% |
VPU vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VPU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VPU vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison
VPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, more than XLV's 1.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VPU Vanguard Utilities ETF | 3.23% | 2.73% | 3.02% | 3.49% | 2.98% | 2.70% | 3.17% | 2.83% | 3.23% | 3.18% | 3.19% | 3.63% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.63% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VPU and XLV have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLV has higher volatility (5.25%) compared to VPU (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VPU dropped -46.31% vs XLV's -39.17%.
On 10-year performance, XLV leads with 10.40% vs 9.30% for VPU. On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLV has performed better with a 10.40% return vs 9.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VPU.
VPU has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 1.63% for XLV.
VPU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while XLV is Health & Biotech Equities. VPU tracks MSCI US Investable Market Utilities 25/50 Index, while XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VPU and 0.08% for XLV.
XLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VPU and XLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer