PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VPN vs. VT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VPN vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF (VPN) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VPN achieves a 52.56% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 12.24% return.


VPN

1D
-0.74%
1M
11.31%
YTD
52.56%
6M
54.49%
1Y
84.73%
3Y*
36.32%
5Y*
15.53%
10Y*

VT

1D
-0.88%
1M
4.91%
YTD
12.24%
6M
13.14%
1Y
29.24%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
12.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VPN vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VPN
Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF
52.56%28.99%14.92%18.93%-30.89%20.35%5.81%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
12.24%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.74%

Correlation

The correlation between VPN and VT is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2020

0.71

The correlation between VPN and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

VPN vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VPN
VT

Real Estate

58.0%
2.4%

Technology

30.6%
27.8%

Communication Services

10.5%
8.3%

Financial Services

0.9%
15.9%

Basic Materials

-

4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.8%

Energy

-

4.3%

Healthcare

-

8.1%

Industrials

-

12.0%

Utilities

-

2.7%

Real Estate

VPN
58.0%
VT
2.4%

Technology

VPN
30.6%
VT
27.8%

Communication Services

VPN
10.5%
VT
8.3%

Financial Services

VPN
0.9%
VT
15.9%

Basic Materials

VPN

-

VT
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VPN

-

VT
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

VPN

-

VT
4.8%

Energy

VPN

-

VT
4.3%

Healthcare

VPN

-

VT
8.1%

Industrials

VPN

-

VT
12.0%

Utilities

VPN

-

VT
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VPN vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VPN
VPN Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
VPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPN Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPN Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VPN vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF (VPN) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VPNVTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.90

2.31

+1.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.71

3.20

+1.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.42

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.61

3.04

+3.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.78

13.53

+7.25

VPN vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VPN Sharpe Ratio is 3.90, which is higher than the VT Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VPN and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VPNVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.90

2.31

+1.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.69

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.44

+0.33

Drawdowns

VPN vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VPN drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPN and VT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VPNVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.98%

-50.27%

+11.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.89%

-9.67%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.96%

-16.51%

-8.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.98%

-26.38%

-12.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-0.88%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.37%

-7.02%

-5.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.09%

2.17%

+1.92%

Volatility

VPN vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF (VPN) has a higher volatility of 7.16% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 3.83%. This indicates that VPN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VPNVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.16%

3.83%

+3.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.92%

10.17%

+6.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.84%

12.70%

+9.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.83%

16.05%

+5.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.90%

17.23%

+4.67%

VPN vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VPN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

VPN vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

VPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than VT's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VPN
Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF
0.72%1.10%1.72%1.18%2.57%1.27%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.59%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


VPN and VT have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VPN has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to VT (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VPN dropped -38.98% vs VT's -50.27%.

On 5-year performance, VPN leads with 15.53% vs 10.99% for VT. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VPN has performed better with a 15.53% return vs 10.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for VPN.

VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.72% for VPN.

VPN is categorized as Technology Equities, while VT is Global Equities. VPN tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for VPN and 0.06% for VT.

VPN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.90 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VPN and VT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer