VOOV vs. IVW
VOOV (Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF) and IVW (iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOOV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Value Index, while IVW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOOV returned 11.86%/yr vs 18.02%/yr for IVW. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VOOV charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IVW.
Performance
VOOV vs. IVW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOOV achieves a 8.52% return, which is significantly lower than IVW's 13.62% return. Over the past 10 years, VOOV has underperformed IVW with an annualized return of 11.86%, while IVW has yielded a comparatively higher 18.02% annualized return.
VOOV
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 2.41%
- YTD
- 8.52%
- 6M
- 9.07%
- 1Y
- 22.81%
- 3Y*
- 16.15%
- 5Y*
- 10.85%
- 10Y*
- 11.86%
IVW
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 6.45%
- YTD
- 13.62%
- 6M
- 12.96%
- 1Y
- 33.45%
- 3Y*
- 28.02%
- 5Y*
- 15.92%
- 10Y*
- 18.02%
VOOV vs. IVW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOOV Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF | 8.52% | 13.10% | 12.21% | 22.15% | -5.37% | 24.87% | 1.23% | 31.75% | -9.09% | 15.26% |
IVW iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF | 13.62% | 21.95% | 35.82% | 29.83% | -29.50% | 31.80% | 33.19% | 30.77% | -0.21% | 27.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOOV and IVW is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | 0.74 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VOOV and IVW has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VOOV vs. IVW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOOV
IVW
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
Technology
VOOV
IVW
Financial Services
VOOV
IVW
Healthcare
VOOV
IVW
Consumer Cyclical
VOOV
IVW
Industrials
VOOV
IVW
Consumer Defensive
VOOV
IVW
Energy
VOOV
IVW
Utilities
VOOV
IVW
Basic Materials
VOOV
IVW
Real Estate
VOOV
IVW
Communication Services
VOOV
IVW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOOV vs. IVW — Risk / Return Rank
VOOV
IVW
VOOV vs. IVW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) and iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VOOV | IVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.36 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.65 | 2.44 | +1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.95 | 10.09 | +3.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VOOV | IVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 2.12 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.88 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.45 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
VOOV vs. IVW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOOV drawdown since its inception was -37.31%, smaller than the maximum IVW drawdown of -57.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOOV and IVW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOOV | IVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.31% | -57.33% | +20.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.27% | -13.75% | +7.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.55% | -22.15% | +4.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.10% | -32.72% | +14.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.31% | -32.72% | -4.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.17% | +1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.84% | -17.61% | +13.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.64% | 3.32% | -1.68% |
Volatility
VOOV vs. IVW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) is 2.08%, while iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) has a volatility of 4.29%. This indicates that VOOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOOV | IVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.08% | 4.29% | -2.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.12% | 12.37% | -5.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.86% | 15.86% | -6.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.46% | 21.15% | -6.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 20.61% | -3.67% |
VOOV vs. IVW - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOOV has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IVW's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VOOV vs. IVW - Dividend Comparison
VOOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than IVW's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVW iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.35% | 0.40% | 0.43% | 1.03% | 0.92% | 0.46% | 0.82% | 1.63% | 1.28% | 1.30% | 1.51% | 1.51% |
VOOV Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.66% | 1.76% | 2.10% | 1.69% | 2.19% | 1.87% | 2.45% | 2.10% | 2.65% | 2.13% | 2.24% | 2.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOOV and IVW have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVW has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to VOOV (2.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOOV dropped -37.31% vs IVW's -57.33%.
On 10-year performance, IVW leads with 18.02% vs 11.86% for VOOV. On fees, VOOV is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VOOV has been the lower-risk option at 2.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVW has performed better with a 18.02% return vs 11.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOOV is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IVW.
VOOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 0.35% for IVW.
VOOV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IVW is Large Cap Growth Equities. VOOV tracks S&P 500 Value Index, while IVW tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VOOV and 0.18% for IVW.
VOOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOOV and IVW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer