VOOG vs. IVW
VOOG (Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF) and IVW (iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOOG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index, while IVW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOOG returned 18.15%/yr vs 18.07%/yr for IVW. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VOOG charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IVW.
Performance
VOOG vs. IVW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VOOG having a 13.78% return and IVW slightly lower at 13.68%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VOOG having a 18.15% annualized return and IVW not far behind at 18.07%.
VOOG
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 7.44%
- YTD
- 13.78%
- 6M
- 13.58%
- 1Y
- 34.04%
- 3Y*
- 28.13%
- 5Y*
- 16.03%
- 10Y*
- 18.15%
IVW
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 7.39%
- YTD
- 13.68%
- 6M
- 13.49%
- 1Y
- 33.77%
- 3Y*
- 27.99%
- 5Y*
- 15.93%
- 10Y*
- 18.07%
VOOG vs. IVW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF | 13.78% | 22.11% | 35.89% | 29.96% | -29.48% | 31.95% | 33.35% | 30.93% | -0.21% | 27.19% |
IVW iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF | 13.68% | 21.95% | 35.82% | 29.83% | -29.50% | 31.80% | 33.19% | 30.77% | -0.21% | 27.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOOG and IVW is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | 0.99 |
The correlation between VOOG and IVW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
VOOG vs. IVW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOOG
IVW
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
VOOG
IVW
Communication Services
VOOG
IVW
Consumer Cyclical
VOOG
IVW
Financial Services
VOOG
IVW
Industrials
VOOG
IVW
Healthcare
VOOG
IVW
Consumer Defensive
VOOG
IVW
Real Estate
VOOG
IVW
Utilities
VOOG
IVW
Basic Materials
VOOG
IVW
Energy
VOOG
IVW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOOG vs. IVW — Risk / Return Rank
VOOG
IVW
VOOG vs. IVW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VOOG | IVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.37 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 2.47 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.32 | 10.19 | +0.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VOOG | IVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 2.14 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.45 | +0.46 |
Drawdowns
VOOG vs. IVW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOOG drawdown since its inception was -32.73%, smaller than the maximum IVW drawdown of -57.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOOG and IVW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOOG | IVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.73% | -57.33% | +24.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.71% | -13.75% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.18% | -22.15% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.73% | -32.72% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.73% | -32.72% | -0.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | -1.12% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -17.62% | +12.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.31% | 3.32% | -0.01% |
Volatility
VOOG vs. IVW - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) have volatilities of 4.32% and 4.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOOG | IVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.32% | 4.30% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.41% | 12.37% | +0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.85% | 15.87% | -0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.19% | 21.16% | +0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.73% | 20.62% | +0.11% |
VOOG vs. IVW - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOOG has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IVW's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VOOG vs. IVW - Dividend Comparison
VOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, more than IVW's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVW iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.35% | 0.40% | 0.43% | 1.03% | 0.92% | 0.46% | 0.82% | 1.63% | 1.28% | 1.30% | 1.51% | 1.51% |
VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.44% | 0.49% | 0.49% | 1.12% | 0.93% | 0.53% | 0.88% | 1.26% | 1.34% | 1.32% | 1.47% | 1.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, VOOG and IVW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VOOG has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to IVW (4.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOOG dropped -32.73% vs IVW's -57.33%.
On 10-year performance, VOOG leads with 18.15% vs 18.07% for IVW. On fees, VOOG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOOG has performed better with a 18.15% return vs 18.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOOG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IVW.
VOOG has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.35% for IVW.
VOOG is categorized as S&P 500, while IVW is Large Cap Growth Equities. Both ETFs track S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VOOG and 0.18% for IVW.
VOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOOG and IVW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer