VONG vs. COWZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ).
VONG and COWZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VONG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010. COWZ is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2016. Both VONG and COWZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VONG or COWZ.
Correlation
The correlation between VONG and COWZ is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
VONG vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
VONG:
2.15
COWZ:
0.86
VONG:
2.77
COWZ:
1.29
VONG:
1.39
COWZ:
1.15
VONG:
2.81
COWZ:
1.35
VONG:
11.01
COWZ:
3.46
VONG:
3.35%
COWZ:
3.37%
VONG:
17.17%
COWZ:
13.65%
VONG:
-32.72%
COWZ:
-38.63%
VONG:
-2.62%
COWZ:
-7.43%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VONG achieves a 35.22% return, which is significantly higher than COWZ's 10.79% return.
VONG
35.22%
3.63%
12.28%
35.39%
19.34%
16.75%
COWZ
10.79%
-4.05%
4.13%
10.69%
15.08%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VONG vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
VONG has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VONG vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VONG vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
VONG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than COWZ's 1.92% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.41% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% | 1.43% | 1.28% |
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.92% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
VONG vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VONG drawdown since its inception was -32.72%, smaller than the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONG and COWZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VONG vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a higher volatility of 4.94% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 4.55%. This indicates that VONG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.