VOE vs. VONV
VOE (Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF) and VONV (Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOE is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index, while VONV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOE returned 10.55%/yr vs 11.35%/yr for VONV. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VOE charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VONV.
Performance
VOE vs. VONV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOE achieves a 10.75% return, which is significantly lower than VONV's 14.28% return. Over the past 10 years, VOE has underperformed VONV with an annualized return of 10.55%, while VONV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.35% annualized return.
VOE
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 10.75%
- 6M
- 11.62%
- 1Y
- 22.73%
- 3Y*
- 16.53%
- 5Y*
- 8.45%
- 10Y*
- 10.55%
VONV
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- 14.28%
- 6M
- 14.88%
- 1Y
- 28.35%
- 3Y*
- 18.56%
- 5Y*
- 10.30%
- 10Y*
- 11.35%
VOE vs. VONV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOE Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF | 10.75% | 12.08% | 14.00% | 9.85% | -7.97% | 28.78% | 2.65% | 27.85% | -12.48% | 17.07% |
VONV Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF | 14.28% | 15.81% | 14.28% | 11.40% | -7.65% | 25.28% | 2.71% | 26.48% | -8.45% | 13.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOE and VONV is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010 | 0.94 |
The correlation between VOE and VONV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
VOE vs. VONV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOE
VONV
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
VOE
VONV
Industrials
VOE
VONV
Energy
VOE
VONV
Utilities
VOE
VONV
Technology
VOE
VONV
Consumer Defensive
VOE
VONV
Healthcare
VOE
VONV
Real Estate
VOE
VONV
Basic Materials
VOE
VONV
Consumer Cyclical
VOE
VONV
Communication Services
VOE
VONV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOE vs. VONV — Risk / Return Rank
VOE
VONV
VOE vs. VONV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VOE | VONV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.48 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 4.18 | -0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.51 | 17.54 | -5.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VOE | VONV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 2.64 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.70 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.66 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.71 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
VOE vs. VONV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOE drawdown since its inception was -61.50%, which is greater than VONV's maximum drawdown of -38.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOE and VONV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOE | VONV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.50% | -38.21% | -23.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.93% | -6.81% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.45% | -15.70% | -2.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.70% | -18.87% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.18% | -38.21% | -4.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | 0.00% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.35% | -3.91% | -4.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 1.62% | +0.20% |
Volatility
VOE vs. VONV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) is 2.58%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) has a volatility of 2.94%. This indicates that VOE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOE | VONV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.58% | 2.94% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.13% | 8.09% | +0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.47% | 10.81% | +0.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.03% | 14.77% | +1.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.83% | 17.24% | +1.59% |
VOE vs. VONV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VONV's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VOE vs. VONV - Dividend Comparison
VOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than VONV's 1.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOE Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.88% | 2.10% | 2.11% | 2.27% | 2.27% | 1.78% | 2.36% | 2.05% | 2.75% | 1.86% | 1.92% | 2.05% |
VONV Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF | 1.63% | 1.82% | 1.97% | 2.10% | 2.22% | 1.67% | 2.25% | 2.30% | 2.56% | 2.18% | 2.39% | 2.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, VOE and VONV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VONV has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to VOE (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOE dropped -61.50% vs VONV's -38.21%.
On 10-year performance, VONV leads with 11.35% vs 10.55% for VOE. On fees, VONV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VOE has been the lower-risk option at 2.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VONV has performed better with a 11.35% return vs 10.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VONV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VOE.
VOE has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 1.63% for VONV.
VOE is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VONV is Large Cap Value Equities. VOE tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index, while VONV tracks Russell 1000 Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VOE and 0.06% for VONV.
VONV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOE and VONV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer