PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOE vs. VONV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOE vs. VONV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOE achieves a 10.75% return, which is significantly lower than VONV's 14.28% return. Over the past 10 years, VOE has underperformed VONV with an annualized return of 10.55%, while VONV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.35% annualized return.


VOE

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.35%
YTD
10.75%
6M
11.62%
1Y
22.73%
3Y*
16.53%
5Y*
8.45%
10Y*
10.55%

VONV

1D
0.00%
1M
4.28%
YTD
14.28%
6M
14.88%
1Y
28.35%
3Y*
18.56%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
11.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOE vs. VONV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
10.75%12.08%14.00%9.85%-7.97%28.78%2.65%27.85%-12.48%17.07%
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
14.28%15.81%14.28%11.40%-7.65%25.28%2.71%26.48%-8.45%13.59%

Correlation

The correlation between VOE and VONV is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.94

The correlation between VOE and VONV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOE vs. VONV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOE
VONV

Financial Services

16.5%
18.9%

Industrials

14.0%
13.1%

Energy

12.8%
7.0%

Utilities

12.1%
4.4%

Technology

10.9%
14.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
7.2%

Healthcare

6.3%
10.9%

Real Estate

6.0%
4.1%

Basic Materials

5.8%
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
7.3%

Communication Services

2.2%
8.5%

Financial Services

VOE
16.5%
VONV
18.9%

Industrials

VOE
14.0%
VONV
13.1%

Energy

VOE
12.8%
VONV
7.0%

Utilities

VOE
12.1%
VONV
4.4%

Technology

VOE
10.9%
VONV
14.9%

Consumer Defensive

VOE
7.9%
VONV
7.2%

Healthcare

VOE
6.3%
VONV
10.9%

Real Estate

VOE
6.0%
VONV
4.1%

Basic Materials

VOE
5.8%
VONV
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VOE
5.7%
VONV
7.3%

Communication Services

VOE
2.2%
VONV
8.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOE vs. VONV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOE
VOE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VOE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VOE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

VONV
VONV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VONV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VONV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOE vs. VONV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOEVONVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.48

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

4.18

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.51

17.54

-5.03

VOE vs. VONV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOE Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the VONV Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOE and VONV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOEVONVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

2.64

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.70

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.66

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.71

-0.27

Drawdowns

VOE vs. VONV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOE drawdown since its inception was -61.50%, which is greater than VONV's maximum drawdown of -38.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOE and VONV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOEVONVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.50%

-38.21%

-23.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.93%

-6.81%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.45%

-15.70%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.70%

-18.87%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.18%

-38.21%

-4.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

0.00%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.35%

-3.91%

-4.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

1.62%

+0.20%

Volatility

VOE vs. VONV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) is 2.58%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) has a volatility of 2.94%. This indicates that VOE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOEVONVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.58%

2.94%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.13%

8.09%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.47%

10.81%

+0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.03%

14.77%

+1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.83%

17.24%

+1.59%

VOE vs. VONV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VONV's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOE vs. VONV - Dividend Comparison

VOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than VONV's 1.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.88%2.10%2.11%2.27%2.27%1.78%2.36%2.05%2.75%1.86%1.92%2.05%
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
1.63%1.82%1.97%2.10%2.22%1.67%2.25%2.30%2.56%2.18%2.39%2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, VOE and VONV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VONV has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to VOE (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOE dropped -61.50% vs VONV's -38.21%.

On 10-year performance, VONV leads with 11.35% vs 10.55% for VOE. On fees, VONV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VOE has been the lower-risk option at 2.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VONV has performed better with a 11.35% return vs 10.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VONV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VOE.

VOE has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 1.63% for VONV.

VOE is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VONV is Large Cap Value Equities. VOE tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index, while VONV tracks Russell 1000 Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VOE and 0.06% for VONV.

VONV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOE and VONV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer