PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOE vs. MDYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOE vs. MDYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) and SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOE achieves a 15.84% return, which is significantly higher than MDYV's 14.30% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VOE having a 10.72% annualized return and MDYV not far behind at 10.58%.


VOE

1D
1.14%
1M
2.56%
6M
10.70%
YTD
15.84%
1Y
25.42%
3Y*
15.44%
5Y*
10.46%
10Y*
10.72%

MDYV

1D
1.42%
1M
2.14%
6M
7.96%
YTD
14.30%
1Y
20.82%
3Y*
12.81%
5Y*
9.94%
10Y*
10.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOE vs. MDYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
15.84%12.08%14.00%9.85%-7.97%28.78%2.65%27.85%-12.48%17.07%
MDYV
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
14.30%7.45%11.48%15.35%-7.19%30.51%3.68%25.89%-11.95%12.31%

Correlation

The correlation between VOE and MDYV is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2006

0.86

The correlation between VOE and MDYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOE vs. MDYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOE
MDYV

Financial Services

16.6%
21.4%

Industrials

12.9%
18.7%

Energy

12.3%
6.8%

Technology

11.9%
10.2%

Utilities

11.6%
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
4.9%

Basic Materials

6.6%
6.3%

Healthcare

6.4%
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%
13.9%

Real Estate

5.6%
9.6%

Communication Services

1.7%
0.5%

Financial Services

VOE
16.6%
MDYV
21.4%

Industrials

VOE
12.9%
MDYV
18.7%

Energy

VOE
12.3%
MDYV
6.8%

Technology

VOE
11.9%
MDYV
10.2%

Utilities

VOE
11.6%
MDYV
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

VOE
7.9%
MDYV
4.9%

Basic Materials

VOE
6.6%
MDYV
6.3%

Healthcare

VOE
6.4%
MDYV
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VOE
6.2%
MDYV
13.9%

Real Estate

VOE
5.6%
MDYV
9.6%

Communication Services

VOE
1.7%
MDYV
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOE vs. MDYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOE
VOE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VOE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VOE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOE Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

MDYV
MDYV Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
MDYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDYV Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
MDYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDYV Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOE vs. MDYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) and SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOEMDYVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.25

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

1.99

+1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.02

6.85

+7.17

VOE vs. MDYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOE Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is higher than the MDYV Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOE and MDYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOE vs. MDYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOE drawdown since its inception was -61.50%, roughly equal to the maximum MDYV drawdown of -60.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOE and MDYV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOEMDYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.50%

-60.71%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.93%

-10.53%

+3.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.45%

-22.58%

+4.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.70%

-22.58%

+2.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.18%

-45.90%

+2.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.30%

-8.58%

+0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

3.05%

-1.23%

Volatility

VOE vs. MDYV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) is 2.91%, while SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) has a volatility of 3.38%. This indicates that VOE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MDYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOEMDYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

3.38%

-0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.20%

10.58%

-2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.45%

15.07%

-3.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.96%

19.37%

-3.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.73%

21.83%

-3.10%

VOE vs. MDYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than MDYV's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOE vs. MDYV - Dividend Comparison

VOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than MDYV's 1.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDYV
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
1.66%1.72%1.89%1.59%1.90%1.74%1.69%1.83%2.28%2.48%1.83%4.31%
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.83%2.10%2.11%2.27%2.27%1.78%2.36%2.05%2.75%1.86%1.92%2.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOE and MDYV have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDYV has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to VOE (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOE dropped -61.50% vs MDYV's -60.71%.

On 10-year performance, VOE leads with 10.72% vs 10.58% for MDYV. On fees, VOE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VOE has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOE has performed better with a 10.72% return vs 10.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MDYV.

VOE has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 1.66% for MDYV.

VOE tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index, while MDYV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VOE and 0.15% for MDYV.

VOE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOE and MDYV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer