PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
VOC vs. CRT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


VOCCRT
YTD Return-22.36%-38.84%
1Y Return-31.99%-44.76%
3Y Return (Ann)13.64%-1.65%
5Y Return (Ann)12.66%14.47%
10Y Return (Ann)5.51%-1.09%
Sharpe Ratio-0.93-1.09
Sortino Ratio-1.25-1.66
Omega Ratio0.850.80
Calmar Ratio-0.55-0.65
Martin Ratio-1.13-1.25
Ulcer Index28.21%34.44%
Daily Std Dev34.27%39.72%
Max Drawdown-87.00%-83.46%
Current Drawdown-52.87%-61.34%

Fundamentals


VOCCRT
Market Cap$82.62M$60.30M
EPS$0.80$1.28
PE Ratio6.087.85
PEG Ratio0.000.00
Total Revenue (TTM)$20.44M$5.98M
Gross Profit (TTM)$14.70M$9.09M
EBITDA (TTM)$15.20M$2.96M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between VOC and CRT is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

VOC vs. CRT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, VOC achieves a -22.36% return, which is significantly higher than CRT's -38.84% return. Over the past 10 years, VOC has outperformed CRT with an annualized return of 5.51%, while CRT has yielded a comparatively lower -1.09% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-11.00%
-24.80%
VOC
CRT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

VOC vs. CRT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VOC Energy Trust (VOC) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VOC, currently valued at -0.93, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.93
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VOC, currently valued at -1.25, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-1.25
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VOC, currently valued at 0.85, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.85
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VOC, currently valued at -0.55, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.55
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VOC, currently valued at -1.13, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-1.13
CRT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CRT, currently valued at -1.09, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-1.09
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CRT, currently valued at -1.66, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-1.66
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CRT, currently valued at 0.80, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.80
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CRT, currently valued at -0.65, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.65
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CRT, currently valued at -1.25, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-1.25

VOC vs. CRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOC Sharpe Ratio is -0.93, which is comparable to the CRT Sharpe Ratio of -1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOC and CRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.40-1.20-1.00-0.80-0.60JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.93
-1.09
VOC
CRT

Dividends

VOC vs. CRT - Dividend Comparison

VOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.78%, more than CRT's 10.73% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
VOC
VOC Energy Trust
14.78%12.43%12.30%10.87%10.14%15.01%19.67%8.36%8.96%19.11%34.64%11.55%
CRT
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
10.73%10.97%7.69%9.70%9.44%10.05%13.08%6.86%5.90%10.41%15.33%7.88%

Drawdowns

VOC vs. CRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOC drawdown since its inception was -87.00%, roughly equal to the maximum CRT drawdown of -83.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOC and CRT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-65.00%-60.00%-55.00%-50.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-52.87%
-61.34%
VOC
CRT

Volatility

VOC vs. CRT - Volatility Comparison

VOC Energy Trust (VOC) has a higher volatility of 12.19% compared to Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) at 8.61%. This indicates that VOC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
12.19%
8.61%
VOC
CRT

Financials

VOC vs. CRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between VOC Energy Trust and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items