PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOC vs. BSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VOC vs. BSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VOC Energy Trust (VOC) and Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOC achieves a 6.30% return, which is significantly lower than BSM's 11.34% return. Over the past 10 years, VOC has outperformed BSM with an annualized return of 10.80%, while BSM has yielded a comparatively lower 8.77% annualized return.


VOC

1D
0.37%
1M
-13.42%
YTD
6.30%
6M
4.37%
1Y
3.79%
3Y*
-20.57%
5Y*
2.32%
10Y*
10.80%

BSM

1D
2.31%
1M
2.60%
YTD
11.34%
6M
8.96%
1Y
19.71%
3Y*
6.84%
5Y*
17.66%
10Y*
8.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOC vs. BSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOC
VOC Energy Trust
6.30%-35.74%-24.87%-23.37%161.55%138.08%-47.61%45.58%-30.78%108.09%
BSM
Black Stone Minerals, L.P.
11.34%0.56%1.47%5.85%80.82%67.42%-42.97%-9.53%-7.04%2.49%

Correlation

The correlation between VOC and BSM is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2015

0.31

Fundamentals

EPS

VOC:

$0.47

BSM:

$1.38

PE Ratio

VOC:

5.81

BSM:

10.29

PEG Ratio

VOC:

0.38

BSM:

0.29

PS Ratio

VOC:

5.14

BSM:

6.53

Total Revenue (TTM)

VOC:

$6.72M

BSM:

$468.25M

Gross Profit (TTM)

VOC:

$6.67M

BSM:

$365.30M

EBITDA (TTM)

VOC:

$5.95M

BSM:

$475.89M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOC vs. BSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOC
VOC Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
VOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOC Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
VOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOC Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

BSM
BSM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
BSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSM Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
BSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSM Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOC vs. BSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VOC Energy Trust (VOC) and Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOCBSMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.17

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.16

1.48

-1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.33

3.36

-3.02

VOC vs. BSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOC Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the BSM Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOC and BSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOC vs. BSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOC drawdown since its inception was -87.00%, which is greater than BSM's maximum drawdown of -75.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOC and BSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOCBSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.00%

-75.58%

-11.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.40%

-13.41%

-10.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.12%

-21.48%

-49.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.56%

-25.52%

-50.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.42%

-75.58%

-2.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.85%

-6.05%

-62.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.07%

-16.86%

-31.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.43%

5.89%

+5.54%

Volatility

VOC vs. BSM - Volatility Comparison

VOC Energy Trust (VOC) has a higher volatility of 10.47% compared to Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM) at 6.43%. This indicates that VOC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOCBSMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.47%

6.43%

+4.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.96%

14.60%

+17.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.57%

20.66%

+19.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.69%

26.35%

+22.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.24%

31.53%

+22.71%

Dividends

VOC vs. BSM - Dividend Comparison

VOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.94%, more than BSM's 8.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSM
Black Stone Minerals, L.P.
8.46%10.16%10.96%11.90%9.13%8.23%10.18%11.64%8.61%6.69%5.86%2.94%
VOC
VOC Energy Trust
14.94%16.11%15.27%12.43%12.30%10.87%10.14%15.01%19.67%8.36%8.96%19.11%

Financials

VOC vs. BSM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between VOC Energy Trust and Black Stone Minerals, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M202220232024202520260
188.46M
(VOC) Total Revenue
(BSM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


VOC and BSM have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOC has higher volatility (10.47%) compared to BSM (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOC dropped -87.00% vs BSM's -75.58%.

BSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOC and BSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer