VNM vs. EWS
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM) and iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS).
VNM and EWS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VNM is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Vietnam Index. It was launched on Aug 11, 2009. EWS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Singapore Index. It was launched on Mar 12, 1996. Both VNM and EWS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VNM or EWS.
Performance
VNM vs. EWS - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VNM achieves a -9.98% return, which is significantly lower than EWS's 24.55% return. Over the past 10 years, VNM has underperformed EWS with an annualized return of -3.94%, while EWS has yielded a comparatively higher 2.59% annualized return.
VNM
-9.98%
-4.04%
-9.42%
-9.54%
-4.74%
-3.94%
EWS
24.55%
4.43%
19.56%
32.60%
3.14%
2.59%
Key characteristics
VNM | EWS | |
---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio | -0.47 | 2.26 |
Sortino Ratio | -0.53 | 3.12 |
Omega Ratio | 0.93 | 1.41 |
Calmar Ratio | -0.15 | 1.68 |
Martin Ratio | -0.90 | 12.43 |
Ulcer Index | 9.26% | 2.65% |
Daily Std Dev | 17.76% | 14.56% |
Max Drawdown | -63.27% | -75.20% |
Current Drawdown | -52.73% | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VNM vs. EWS - Expense Ratio Comparison
VNM has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than EWS's 0.50% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between VNM and EWS is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VNM vs. EWS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM) and iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VNM vs. EWS - Dividend Comparison
VNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.80%, more than EWS's 3.87% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF | 5.80% | 5.22% | 0.96% | 0.48% | 0.40% | 0.76% | 0.83% | 0.99% | 2.44% | 3.69% | 2.65% | 3.19% |
iShares MSCI Singapore ETF | 3.87% | 6.49% | 2.56% | 6.00% | 2.68% | 4.70% | 4.21% | 3.46% | 3.96% | 4.20% | 3.35% | 3.77% |
Drawdowns
VNM vs. EWS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VNM drawdown since its inception was -63.27%, smaller than the maximum EWS drawdown of -75.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNM and EWS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VNM vs. EWS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM) is 4.20%, while iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) has a volatility of 4.46%. This indicates that VNM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.