VNLA vs. BND
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND).
VNLA and BND are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VNLA is an actively managed fund by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Nov 16, 2016. BND is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2007.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VNLA or BND.
Key characteristics
| VNLA | BND | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 5.56% | 2.40% |
| 1Y Return | 7.16% | 8.91% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 3.76% | -2.38% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.90% | 0.01% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 7.15 | 1.38 |
| Sortino Ratio | 13.51 | 2.03 |
| Omega Ratio | 3.09 | 1.24 |
| Calmar Ratio | 24.82 | 0.51 |
| Martin Ratio | 115.51 | 4.99 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.06% | 1.62% |
| Daily Std Dev | 1.00% | 5.85% |
| Max Drawdown | -4.49% | -18.84% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -8.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between VNLA and BND is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
VNLA vs. BND - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, VNLA achieves a 5.56% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 2.40% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VNLA vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
VNLA has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VNLA vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VNLA vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
VNLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.82%, more than BND's 3.55% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VNLA Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF | 4.82% | 3.95% | 4.35% | 1.67% | 1.21% | 3.13% | 3.74% | 1.79% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.55% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 1.97% | 2.22% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% | 2.79% | 2.78% |
Drawdowns
VNLA vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VNLA drawdown since its inception was -4.49%, smaller than the maximum BND drawdown of -18.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNLA and BND. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VNLA vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) is 0.24%, while Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) has a volatility of 1.67%. This indicates that VNLA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.