PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMIAX vs. XLB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMIAX vs. XLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Materials Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMIAX) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMIAX achieves a 13.48% return, which is significantly lower than XLB's 14.35% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VMIAX having a 10.36% annualized return and XLB not far behind at 10.23%.


VMIAX

1D
1.31%
1M
2.84%
YTD
13.48%
6M
16.50%
1Y
23.03%
3Y*
12.54%
5Y*
5.88%
10Y*
10.36%

XLB

1D
0.21%
1M
1.93%
YTD
14.35%
6M
17.15%
1Y
19.99%
3Y*
11.71%
5Y*
5.35%
10Y*
10.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMIAX vs. XLB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMIAX
Vanguard Materials Index Fund Admiral Shares
13.48%12.26%0.45%13.69%-11.77%27.15%19.37%23.59%-17.38%23.68%
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
14.35%9.94%0.15%12.46%-12.30%27.44%20.46%24.13%-14.88%24.01%

Correlation

The correlation between VMIAX and XLB is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2004

0.98

The correlation between VMIAX and XLB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

VMIAX vs. XLB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VMIAX
XLB

Basic Materials

90.2%
87.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
12.4%

Industrials

1.0%
1.5%

Energy

0.5%

-

Healthcare

0.5%

-

Technology

0.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.0%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

VMIAX
90.2%
XLB
87.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VMIAX
8.3%
XLB
12.4%

Industrials

VMIAX
1.0%
XLB
1.5%

Energy

VMIAX
0.5%
XLB

-

Healthcare

VMIAX
0.5%
XLB

-

Technology

VMIAX
0.1%
XLB

-

Consumer Defensive

VMIAX
0.0%
XLB

-

Communication Services

VMIAX

-

XLB

-

Financial Services

VMIAX

-

XLB

-

Real Estate

VMIAX

-

XLB

-

Utilities

VMIAX

-

XLB

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMIAX vs. XLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMIAX
VMIAX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
VMIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
VMIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

XLB
XLB Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
XLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLB Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
XLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLB Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMIAX vs. XLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Materials Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMIAX) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VMIAXXLBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.39

1.20

+0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.98

1.76

+0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.21

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

1.62

+0.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.98

5.06

+0.92

VMIAX vs. XLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMIAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the XLB Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMIAX and XLB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VMIAXXLBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

1.20

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.28

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.50

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.36

+0.03

Drawdowns

VMIAX vs. XLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMIAX drawdown since its inception was -62.17%, roughly equal to the maximum XLB drawdown of -59.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMIAX and XLB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMIAXXLBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.17%

-59.83%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.41%

-12.38%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.21%

-23.17%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.45%

-24.72%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.02%

-37.27%

-3.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.53%

-3.28%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.63%

-10.84%

+1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.08%

3.96%

+0.12%

Volatility

VMIAX vs. XLB - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Materials Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMIAX) has a higher volatility of 6.36% compared to Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) at 5.73%. This indicates that VMIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMIAXXLBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.36%

5.73%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.89%

12.85%

+1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.66%

16.78%

+0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.67%

18.94%

+0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.23%

20.65%

+0.58%

VMIAX vs. XLB - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMIAX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XLB's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VMIAX vs. XLB - Dividend Comparison

VMIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than XLB's 1.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VMIAX
Vanguard Materials Index Fund Admiral Shares
1.36%1.55%1.70%1.72%1.98%1.33%1.67%1.94%2.02%1.63%1.73%2.31%
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.69%1.92%1.92%2.00%2.26%1.62%1.72%1.98%2.20%1.66%1.95%2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, VMIAX and XLB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VMIAX has higher volatility (6.36%) compared to XLB (5.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMIAX dropped -62.17% vs XLB's -59.83%.

VMIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMIAX and XLB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer