VMC vs. PWR
VMC (Vulcan Materials Company) and PWR (Quanta Services, Inc.) are both stocks. VMC operates in Building Materials (Basic Materials), while PWR operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, VMC returned 9.64%/yr vs 39.06%/yr for PWR. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
VMC vs. PWR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VMC achieves a -5.47% return, which is significantly lower than PWR's 58.22% return. Over the past 10 years, VMC has underperformed PWR with an annualized return of 9.64%, while PWR has yielded a comparatively higher 39.06% annualized return.
VMC
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -11.42%
- 6M
- -10.29%
- YTD
- -5.47%
- 1Y
- -1.61%
- 3Y*
- 7.03%
- 5Y*
- 9.20%
- 10Y*
- 9.64%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.47%
PWR
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- 6M
- 40.66%
- YTD
- 58.22%
- 1Y
- 69.02%
- 3Y*
- 49.15%
- 5Y*
- 49.23%
- 10Y*
- 39.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.25%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $832.20M | $746.35M | $898.56M | |
| $344.84M | $306.72M | $334.39M |
VMC vs. PWR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMC Vulcan Materials Company | -5.47% | 11.70% | 14.12% | 30.75% | -14.87% | 41.09% | 4.15% | 47.13% | -22.28% | 3.42% |
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 58.22% | 33.70% | 46.60% | 51.70% | 24.63% | 59.50% | 77.74% | 35.84% | -22.93% | 12.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between VMC and PWR is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 1998 | 0.41 |
The correlation between VMC and PWR shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
VMC:
$34.85B
PWR:
$100.14B
VMC:
$8.49
PWR:
$8.81
VMC:
31.62
PWR:
75.79
VMC:
1.97
PWR:
3.76
VMC:
4.37
PWR:
3.09
VMC:
4.15
PWR:
10.56
VMC:
$8.11B
PWR:
$32.78B
VMC:
$2.22B
PWR:
$4.73B
VMC:
$2.56B
PWR:
$3.04B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VMC vs. PWR — Risk / Return Rank
VMC
PWR
VMC vs. PWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vulcan Materials Company (VMC) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VMC | PWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.29 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 2.27 | -2.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.15 | 9.09 | -9.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VMC vs. PWR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMC drawdown since its inception was -76.02%, smaller than the maximum PWR drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMC and PWR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VMC | PWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.02% | -97.07% | +21.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.05% | -28.53% | +6.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.43% | -33.89% | +9.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.50% | -33.89% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.23% | -45.53% | -3.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.39% | -15.00% | -3.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.70% | -46.69% | +27.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.96% | 7.35% | +2.61% |
Volatility
VMC vs. PWR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vulcan Materials Company (VMC) is 9.28%, while Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) has a volatility of 19.77%. This indicates that VMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VMC | PWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.28% | 19.77% | -10.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.80% | 35.51% | -12.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.24% | 43.07% | -15.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.42% | 37.03% | -10.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.46% | 34.42% | -3.96% |
Dividends
VMC vs. PWR - Dividend Comparison
VMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, more than PWR's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.15% | 0.25% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VMC Vulcan Materials Company | 0.75% | 0.69% | 0.72% | 0.76% | 0.91% | 0.71% | 0.92% | 0.86% | 1.13% | 0.78% | 0.64% | 0.42% |
Financials
VMC vs. PWR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vulcan Materials Company and Quanta Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
VMC vs. PWR - Profitability Comparison
VMC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vulcan Materials Company reported a gross profit of 625.50M and revenue of 2.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.0%.
PWR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.55B and revenue of 9.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.2%.
VMC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vulcan Materials Company reported an operating income of 425.30M and revenue of 2.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.7%.
PWR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 694.83M and revenue of 9.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.
VMC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vulcan Materials Company reported a net income of 323.40M and revenue of 2.16B, resulting in a net margin of 15.0%.
PWR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a net income of 451.38M and revenue of 9.56B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
VMC and PWR have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PWR has higher volatility (19.77%) compared to VMC (9.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMC dropped -76.02% vs PWR's -97.07%.
PWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VMC and PWR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer