VLU vs. IWD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VLU (SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF) and IWD (iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - VLU tracks the S&P 1500 Low Valuation Tilt Index while IWD tracks the Russell 1000 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VLU returned 13.99%/yr vs 11.23%/yr for IWD. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VLU charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IWD.

Performance

VLU vs. IWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF (VLU) and iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLU achieves a 12.99% return, which is significantly lower than IWD's 14.20% return. Over the past 10 years, VLU has outperformed IWD with an annualized return of 13.99%, while IWD has yielded a comparatively lower 11.23% annualized return.

VLU

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: 3.04%
• YTD: 12.99%
• 6M: 13.61%
• 1Y: 29.22%
• 3Y*: 20.61%
• 5Y*: 11.91%
• 10Y*: 13.99%

IWD

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 4.22%
• YTD: 14.20%
• 6M: 14.76%
• 1Y: 28.16%
• 3Y*: 18.40%
• 5Y*: 10.17%
• 10Y*: 11.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VLU vs. IWD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VLU SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF	12.99%	16.70%	17.24%	17.18%	-8.24%	30.95%	9.91%	26.20%	-7.89%	18.16%
IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF	14.20%	15.68%	14.17%	11.34%	-7.75%	24.95%	2.73%	26.12%	-8.45%	13.45%

Correlation

The correlation between VLU and IWD is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2012	0.75

Over the past year, VLU and IWD have become more correlated (0.96) than their long-term average of 0.75, meaning their price movements have been converging.

VLU vs. IWD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VLU	IWD
Financial Services	18.8%	18.5%
Technology	17.8%	17.9%
Healthcare	11.7%	10.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.4%	7.0%
Communication Services	8.8%	8.2%
Industrials	8.2%	12.7%
Consumer Defensive	7.4%	6.7%
Energy	7.2%	6.5%
Utilities	3.6%	4.1%
Real Estate	3.4%	3.9%
Basic Materials	2.6%	3.7%

Return for Risk

VLU vs. IWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLU

VLU Risk / Return Rank: 83
VLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
VLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
VLU Omega Ratio Rank: 81
VLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
VLU Martin Ratio Rank: 86

IWD

IWD Risk / Return Rank: 80
IWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
IWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
IWD Omega Ratio Rank: 78
IWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
IWD Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLU vs. IWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF (VLU) and iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VLU	IWD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.70	2.63	+0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.78	3.71	+0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.47	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.63	4.17	+0.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.56	17.46	+1.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VLU vs. IWD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLU Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the IWD Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLU and IWD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VLU	IWD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.70	2.63	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78	0.69	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78	0.65	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	0.43	+0.39

Drawdowns

VLU vs. IWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLU drawdown since its inception was -37.39%, smaller than the maximum IWD drawdown of -60.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLU and IWD.

Drawdown Indicators

	VLU	IWD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.39%	-60.10%	+22.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.34%	-6.79%	+0.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.22%	-15.71%	-0.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.55%	-19.04%	-0.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.39%	-38.51%	+1.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	-0.01%	-0.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.74%	-8.65%	+4.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.58%	1.62%	-0.04%

Volatility

VLU vs. IWD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF (VLU) is 2.25%, while iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) has a volatility of 2.90%. This indicates that VLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VLU	IWD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.25%	2.90%	-0.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.70%	8.06%	-0.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.90%	10.77%	+0.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.40%	14.81%	+0.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.09%	17.29%	+0.80%

VLU vs. IWD - Expense Ratio Comparison

VLU has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IWD's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VLU vs. IWD - Dividend Comparison

VLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, more than IWD's 1.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF	1.50%	1.69%	1.87%	2.02%	2.15%	1.62%	2.05%	2.45%	2.71%	2.09%	2.25%	2.47%
VLU SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF	1.62%	1.82%	2.00%	2.02%	2.16%	1.86%	1.98%	2.19%	2.57%	1.96%	2.14%	6.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VLU and IWD in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, VLU and IWD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, VLU or IWD?

IWD has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to VLU (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLU dropped -37.39% vs IWD's -60.10%.

Which ETF is better, VLU or IWD?

On 10-year performance, VLU leads with 13.99% vs 11.23% for IWD. On fees, VLU is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, VLU has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VLU or IWD?

Over the 10-year period, VLU has performed better with a 13.99% return vs 11.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VLU or IWD?

VLU is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IWD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VLU or IWD?

VLU has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 1.50% for IWD.

What is the main difference between VLU and IWD?

VLU tracks S&P 1500 Low Valuation Tilt Index, while IWD tracks Russell 1000 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VLU and 0.18% for IWD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.