PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VLU vs. AVUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VLU vs. AVUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF (VLU) and Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VLU having a 19.00% return and AVUS slightly lower at 18.06%.


VLU

1D
1.12%
1M
3.66%
6M
12.67%
YTD
19.00%
1Y
31.34%
3Y*
20.17%
5Y*
13.37%
10Y*
14.17%
ALL TIME*
13.95%

AVUS

1D
1.56%
1M
3.34%
6M
13.45%
YTD
18.06%
1Y
28.92%
3Y*
21.07%
5Y*
13.24%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$33.31M$38.45M$43.30M
$1.43M$1.32M$1.58M

VLU vs. AVUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VLU
SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF
19.00%16.70%17.24%17.18%-8.24%30.95%9.91%8.06%
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
18.06%16.68%20.43%21.77%-13.82%28.73%17.58%8.55%

Correlation

The correlation between VLU and AVUS is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019

0.94

The correlation between VLU and AVUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

VLU vs. AVUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VLU
AVUS

Financial Services

19.3%
16.2%

Technology

18.4%
29.7%

Healthcare

12.3%
7.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
10.5%

Industrials

8.8%
10.8%

Communication Services

8.0%
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.1%
4.3%

Energy

6.3%
7.3%

Utilities

3.6%
2.8%

Real Estate

3.5%
0.1%

Basic Materials

2.4%
2.8%

Financial Services

VLU
19.3%
AVUS
16.2%

Technology

VLU
18.4%
AVUS
29.7%

Healthcare

VLU
12.3%
AVUS
7.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VLU
10.4%
AVUS
10.5%

Industrials

VLU
8.8%
AVUS
10.8%

Communication Services

VLU
8.0%
AVUS
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

VLU
7.1%
AVUS
4.3%

Energy

VLU
6.3%
AVUS
7.3%

Utilities

VLU
3.6%
AVUS
2.8%

Real Estate

VLU
3.5%
AVUS
0.1%

Basic Materials

VLU
2.4%
AVUS
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VLU vs. AVUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VLU
VLU Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLU Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
VLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLU Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

AVUS
AVUS Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
AVUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUS Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VLU vs. AVUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF (VLU) and Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VLUAVUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.40

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.97

3.70

+1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.62

16.33

+4.29

VLU vs. AVUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLU Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is comparable to the AVUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLU and AVUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VLU vs. AVUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLU drawdown since its inception was -37.39%, roughly equal to the maximum AVUS drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLU and AVUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VLUAVUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.39%

-37.04%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.34%

-7.85%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.22%

-19.74%

+3.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.55%

-22.19%

+2.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.70%

-4.99%

+1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

1.78%

-0.26%

Volatility

VLU vs. AVUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF (VLU) is 2.92%, while Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) has a volatility of 3.86%. This indicates that VLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VLUAVUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

3.86%

-0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.71%

10.07%

-2.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.80%

12.96%

-2.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.30%

17.34%

-2.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.98%

20.71%

-2.73%

VLU vs. AVUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VLU has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than AVUS's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VLU vs. AVUS - Dividend Comparison

VLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, more than AVUS's 0.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
0.90%1.08%1.27%1.41%1.59%1.08%1.19%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VLU
SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF
1.56%1.82%2.00%2.02%2.16%1.86%1.98%2.19%2.57%1.96%2.14%6.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


VLU and AVUS have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVUS has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to VLU (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLU dropped -37.39% vs AVUS's -37.04%.

On 5-year performance, VLU leads with 13.37% vs 13.24% for AVUS. On fees, VLU is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, VLU has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VLU has performed better with a 13.37% return vs 13.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VLU is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for AVUS.

VLU has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 0.90% for AVUS.

VLU is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while AVUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VLU and 0.15% for AVUS.

VLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VLU and AVUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer