PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VLU vs. AVUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VLU vs. AVUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF (VLU) and Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLU achieves a 12.99% return, which is significantly lower than AVUS's 14.42% return.


VLU

1D
-0.49%
1M
3.04%
YTD
12.99%
6M
13.61%
1Y
29.22%
3Y*
20.61%
5Y*
11.91%
10Y*
13.99%

AVUS

1D
-0.46%
1M
4.77%
YTD
14.42%
6M
14.71%
1Y
32.34%
3Y*
22.35%
5Y*
13.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VLU vs. AVUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VLU
SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF
12.99%16.70%17.24%17.18%-8.24%30.95%9.91%8.57%
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
14.42%16.68%20.43%21.77%-13.82%28.73%17.58%8.87%

Correlation

The correlation between VLU and AVUS is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.95

The correlation between VLU and AVUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

VLU vs. AVUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VLU
AVUS

Financial Services

18.8%
15.2%

Technology

17.8%
27.5%

Healthcare

11.7%
7.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
11.8%

Communication Services

8.8%
9.8%

Industrials

8.2%
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%
4.4%

Energy

7.2%
7.4%

Utilities

3.6%
2.5%

Real Estate

3.4%
0.2%

Basic Materials

2.6%
2.7%

Financial Services

VLU
18.8%
AVUS
15.2%

Technology

VLU
17.8%
AVUS
27.5%

Healthcare

VLU
11.7%
AVUS
7.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VLU
10.4%
AVUS
11.8%

Communication Services

VLU
8.8%
AVUS
9.8%

Industrials

VLU
8.2%
AVUS
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

VLU
7.4%
AVUS
4.4%

Energy

VLU
7.2%
AVUS
7.4%

Utilities

VLU
3.6%
AVUS
2.5%

Real Estate

VLU
3.4%
AVUS
0.2%

Basic Materials

VLU
2.6%
AVUS
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VLU vs. AVUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLU
VLU Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
VLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLU Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
VLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLU Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

AVUS
AVUS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
AVUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLU vs. AVUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF (VLU) and Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VLUAVUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.48

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.63

4.14

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.56

18.85

-0.28

VLU vs. AVUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLU Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the AVUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLU and AVUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VLUAVUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

2.68

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.76

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.80

+0.02

Drawdowns

VLU vs. AVUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLU drawdown since its inception was -37.39%, roughly equal to the maximum AVUS drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLU and AVUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VLUAVUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.39%

-37.04%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.34%

-7.85%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.22%

-19.74%

+3.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.55%

-22.19%

+2.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-0.46%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.74%

-5.09%

+1.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

1.72%

-0.14%

Volatility

VLU vs. AVUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF (VLU) is 2.25%, while Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) has a volatility of 2.98%. This indicates that VLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VLUAVUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.25%

2.98%

-0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.70%

9.00%

-1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.90%

12.15%

-1.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.40%

17.29%

-1.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.09%

20.85%

-2.76%

VLU vs. AVUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VLU has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than AVUS's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VLU vs. AVUS - Dividend Comparison

VLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, more than AVUS's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
0.91%1.08%1.27%1.41%1.59%1.08%1.19%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VLU
SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF
1.62%1.82%2.00%2.02%2.16%1.86%1.98%2.19%2.57%1.96%2.14%6.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, VLU and AVUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AVUS has higher volatility (2.98%) compared to VLU (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLU dropped -37.39% vs AVUS's -37.04%.

On 5-year performance, AVUS leads with 13.04% vs 11.91% for VLU. On fees, VLU is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, VLU has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVUS has performed better with a 13.04% return vs 11.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VLU is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for AVUS.

VLU has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 0.91% for AVUS.

VLU is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while AVUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VLU and 0.15% for AVUS.

VLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VLU and AVUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer