PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VLN vs. KC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VLN vs. KC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Valens Semiconductor Ltd. (VLN) and Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (KC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLN achieves a 52.82% return, which is significantly higher than KC's -13.93% return.


VLN

1D
9.60%
1M
-38.53%
YTD
52.82%
6M
53.90%
1Y
-14.90%
3Y*
-4.99%
5Y*
10Y*

KC

1D
3.73%
1M
-27.52%
YTD
-13.93%
6M
-15.64%
1Y
-29.25%
3Y*
13.42%
5Y*
-23.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VLN vs. KC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VLN
Valens Semiconductor Ltd.
52.82%-45.38%6.12%-54.38%-30.26%7.24%
KC
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited
-13.93%-1.43%177.51%-1.31%-75.68%-44.39%

Correlation

The correlation between VLN and KC is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021

0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VLN:

$227.95M

KC:

$2.70B

EPS

VLN:

-$0.31

KC:

-CN¥3.28

PS Ratio

VLN:

3.16

KC:

1.73

PB Ratio

VLN:

2.27

KC:

2.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

VLN:

$70.66M

KC:

CN¥10.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VLN:

$43.99M

KC:

CN¥1.53B

EBITDA (TTM)

VLN:

-$30.36M

KC:

-CN¥410.92M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VLN vs. KC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLN
VLN Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
VLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLN Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLN Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

KC
KC Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
KC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
KC Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
KC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
KC Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLN vs. KC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Valens Semiconductor Ltd. (VLN) and Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (KC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VLNKCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.98

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.23

-0.56

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.36

-1.19

+0.84

VLN vs. KC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLN Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is higher than the KC Sharpe Ratio of -0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLN and KC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VLN vs. KC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLN drawdown since its inception was -90.13%, smaller than the maximum KC drawdown of -97.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLN and KC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VLNKCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.13%

-97.36%

+7.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.42%

-52.88%

-11.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.92%

-70.77%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-80.71%

-87.65%

+6.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-71.21%

-74.72%

+3.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.92%

24.56%

+17.36%

Volatility

VLN vs. KC - Volatility Comparison

Valens Semiconductor Ltd. (VLN) has a higher volatility of 48.96% compared to Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (KC) at 18.02%. This indicates that VLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VLNKCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

48.96%

18.02%

+30.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

92.32%

57.58%

+34.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

109.60%

75.85%

+33.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

78.97%

103.93%

-24.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

78.97%

100.41%

-21.44%

Dividends

VLN vs. KC - Dividend Comparison

Neither VLN nor KC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

VLN vs. KC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Valens Semiconductor Ltd. and Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
16.86M
2.70B
(VLN) Total Revenue
(KC) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. VLN values in USD, KC values in CNY

VLN vs. KC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Valens Semiconductor Ltd. and Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
62.2%
12.8%
Portfolio components
VLN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Valens Semiconductor Ltd. reported a gross profit of 10.49M and revenue of 16.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.2%.

KC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 345.75M and revenue of 2.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.8%.

VLN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Valens Semiconductor Ltd. reported an operating income of -9.22M and revenue of 16.86M, resulting in an operating margin of -54.7%.

KC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited reported an operating income of -166.11M and revenue of 2.70B, resulting in an operating margin of -6.1%.

VLN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Valens Semiconductor Ltd. reported a net income of -8.29M and revenue of 16.86M, resulting in a net margin of -49.2%.

KC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited reported a net income of -343.82M and revenue of 2.70B, resulting in a net margin of -12.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VLN and KC have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VLN has higher volatility (48.96%) compared to KC (18.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLN dropped -90.13% vs KC's -97.36%.

VLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.14 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VLN and KC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer