PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VLACX vs. VV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VLACX vs. VV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Large Cap Index Fund (VLACX) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLACX achieves a 10.98% return, which is significantly higher than VV's 10.39% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VLACX having a 15.04% annualized return and VV not far ahead at 15.16%.


VLACX

1D
0.40%
1M
0.87%
6M
9.55%
YTD
10.98%
1Y
21.80%
3Y*
20.26%
5Y*
12.75%
10Y*
15.04%

VV

1D
-0.62%
1M
0.25%
6M
8.96%
YTD
10.39%
1Y
21.26%
3Y*
20.25%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
15.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VLACX vs. VV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VLACX
Vanguard Large Cap Index Fund
10.98%17.60%24.61%27.10%-19.78%26.87%20.88%31.22%-4.60%21.89%
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
10.39%18.11%25.25%27.18%-19.91%27.41%21.04%31.25%-4.46%22.00%

Correlation

The correlation between VLACX and VV is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.99

The correlation between VLACX and VV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VLACX vs. VV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLACX
VLACX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VLACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLACX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VLACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLACX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

VV
VV Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VV Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLACX vs. VV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Large Cap Index Fund (VLACX) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VLACXVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.30

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

2.32

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.46

9.98

+0.48

VLACX vs. VV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLACX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the VV Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLACX and VV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VLACX vs. VV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLACX drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, roughly equal to the maximum VV drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLACX and VV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VLACXVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.81%

-54.81%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.22%

-9.21%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.27%

-18.97%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.72%

-25.66%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.97%

-34.28%

+0.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-0.98%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.90%

-6.81%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

2.14%

-0.01%

Volatility

VLACX vs. VV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Large Cap Index Fund (VLACX) has a higher volatility of 3.71% compared to Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) at 3.43%. This indicates that VLACX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VLACXVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.71%

3.43%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.08%

10.05%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.65%

12.69%

-0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.28%

17.34%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

18.18%

+0.01%

VLACX vs. VV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VLACX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than VV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VLACX vs. VV - Dividend Comparison

VLACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than VV's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VLACX
Vanguard Large Cap Index Fund
0.89%0.71%0.86%1.30%1.51%1.07%1.35%1.72%1.95%1.64%1.87%1.84%
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
1.02%1.08%1.24%1.41%1.66%1.19%1.46%1.81%2.09%1.75%1.98%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, VLACX and VV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VLACX has higher volatility (3.71%) compared to VV (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLACX dropped -54.81% vs VV's -54.81%.

VLACX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VLACX and VV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer