VIXY vs. SMH
VIXY (ProShares VIX Short-Term Futures ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VIXY is a Volatility fund tracking the S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures Index Total Return, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VIXY returned -47.13%/yr vs 37.68%/yr for SMH. At a correlation of -0.62, they often move in opposite directions. VIXY charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
VIXY vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIXY achieves a -8.27% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 77.13% return. Over the past 10 years, VIXY has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of -47.13%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.68% annualized return.
VIXY
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -15.15%
- YTD
- -8.27%
- 6M
- -22.71%
- 1Y
- -53.80%
- 3Y*
- -42.73%
- 5Y*
- -46.70%
- 10Y*
- -47.13%
SMH
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 25.87%
- YTD
- 77.13%
- 6M
- 75.61%
- 1Y
- 157.20%
- 3Y*
- 64.17%
- 5Y*
- 39.21%
- 10Y*
- 37.68%
VIXY vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIXY ProShares VIX Short-Term Futures ETF | -8.27% | -43.05% | -27.43% | -72.74% | -24.98% | -72.40% | 10.54% | -67.81% | 66.78% | -72.78% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 77.13% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIXY and SMH is -0.53, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2011 | -0.62 |
The correlation between VIXY and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.62 to -0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIXY vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
VIXY
SMH
VIXY vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (VIXY) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VIXY | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.72 | -0.90 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | 10.59 | -11.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.34 | 40.63 | -41.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VIXY | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.97 | 5.19 | -6.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.67 | 1.13 | -1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.65 | 1.16 | -1.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.69 | 0.34 | -1.03 |
Drawdowns
VIXY vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIXY drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than SMH's maximum drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIXY and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIXY | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -84.96% | -15.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.72% | -14.93% | -41.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -81.00% | -35.74% | -45.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.92% | -45.30% | -50.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.87% | -45.30% | -54.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | 0.00% | -100.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.18% | -41.09% | -51.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.22% | 3.89% | +36.33% |
Volatility
VIXY vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (VIXY) is 8.03%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 11.47%. This indicates that VIXY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIXY | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.03% | 11.47% | -3.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.47% | 24.29% | +17.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.89% | 30.56% | +25.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.31% | 35.01% | +35.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.48% | 32.57% | +39.91% |
VIXY vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIXY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
VIXY vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
VIXY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
VIXY ProShares VIX Short-Term Futures ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIXY and SMH have a correlation of -0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (11.47%) compared to VIXY (8.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIXY dropped -100.00% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 37.68% vs -47.13% for VIXY. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, VIXY has been the lower-risk option at 8.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 37.68% return vs -47.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for VIXY.
SMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.00% for VIXY.
VIXY is categorized as Volatility, while SMH is Semiconductors. VIXY tracks S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures Index Total Return, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProFund Advisors LLC and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for VIXY and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.19 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIXY and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer