VIXM vs. SCHD
VIXM (ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VIXM is a Volatility fund tracking the S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VIXM returned -11.18%/yr vs 12.80%/yr for SCHD. Their -0.62 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. VIXM charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
VIXM vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIXM achieves a -5.57% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 25.44% return. Over the past 10 years, VIXM has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of -11.18%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.80% annualized return.
VIXM
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- 6M
- -5.57%
- YTD
- -5.57%
- 1Y
- -14.47%
- 3Y*
- -10.95%
- 5Y*
- -14.33%
- 10Y*
- -11.18%
- ALL TIME*
- -18.02%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- 6M
- 12.81%
- YTD
- 25.44%
- 1Y
- 31.88%
- 3Y*
- 15.21%
- 5Y*
- 9.72%
- 10Y*
- 12.80%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $839.54M | $733.40M | $694.82M | |
| $8.24M | $6.07M | $4.69M |
VIXM vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIXM ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF | -5.57% | 5.60% | -13.67% | -44.83% | -0.69% | -16.70% | 72.38% | -20.38% | 26.43% | -50.05% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 25.44% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIXM and SCHD is -0.25, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | -0.62 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between VIXM and SCHD has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.62 to -0.25, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIXM vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
VIXM
SCHD
VIXM vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF (VIXM) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VIXM | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.52 | -0.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | 6.94 | -7.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | 17.52 | -18.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VIXM vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIXM drawdown since its inception was -96.23%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIXM and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIXM | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.23% | -33.37% | -62.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.36% | -4.61% | -14.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.26% | -16.13% | -21.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.40% | -16.85% | -46.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.34% | -33.37% | -38.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.04% | -0.12% | -95.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.65% | -3.29% | -78.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.17% | 1.82% | +8.35% |
Volatility
VIXM vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF (VIXM) is 3.09%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 3.82%. This indicates that VIXM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIXM | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.09% | 3.82% | -0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.72% | 8.01% | +5.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.41% | 11.06% | +7.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.50% | 14.38% | +16.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.61% | 16.73% | +15.88% |
VIXM vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIXM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
VIXM vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
VIXM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.10% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
VIXM ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIXM and SCHD have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHD has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to VIXM (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIXM dropped -96.23% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.80% vs -11.18% for VIXM. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VIXM has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.80% return vs -11.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for VIXM.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.10%, compared with 0.00% for VIXM.
VIXM is categorized as Volatility, while SCHD is Dividend. VIXM tracks S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for VIXM and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIXM and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer