VIVAX vs. EW

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Value Index Fund (VIVAX) and Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW).

VIVAX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Nov 2, 1992.

Performance

VIVAX vs. EW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Value Index Fund (VIVAX) and Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

VIVAX vs. EW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VIVAX Vanguard Value Index Fund	1.61%	14.50%	15.85%	9.08%	-2.18%	26.32%	2.18%	25.66%	-5.56%	16.98%
EW Edwards Lifesciences Corporation	-6.06%	15.16%	-2.91%	2.20%	-42.41%	42.00%	17.32%	52.31%	35.90%	20.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIVAX achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly higher than EW's -6.06% return. Over the past 10 years, VIVAX has outperformed EW with an annualized return of 11.42%, while EW has yielded a comparatively lower 10.33% annualized return.

VIVAX

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: -6.37%
• YTD: 1.61%
• 6M: 4.57%
• 1Y: 14.03%
• 3Y*: 14.10%
• 5Y*: 10.37%
• 10Y*: 11.42%

EW

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: -7.39%
• YTD: -6.06%
• 6M: 2.97%
• 1Y: 10.49%
• 3Y*: -1.08%
• 5Y*: -0.91%
• 10Y*: 10.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

VIVAX vs. EW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIVAX

VIVAX Risk / Return Rank: 57
VIVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
VIVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
VIVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
VIVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
VIVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

EW

EW Risk / Return Rank: 58
EW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
EW Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
EW Omega Ratio Rank: 49
EW Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
EW Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIVAX vs. EW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Value Index Fund (VIVAX) and Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VIVAX	EW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.03	0.44	+0.59
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.49	0.83	+0.66
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.10	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.23	1.02	+0.22
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.60	2.82	+2.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VIVAX vs. EW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIVAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is higher than the EW Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIVAX and EW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VIVAX	EW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.03	0.44	+0.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	-0.03	+0.78
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	0.32	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.51	+0.03

Correlation

The correlation between VIVAX and EW is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

VIVAX vs. EW - Dividend Comparison

VIVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, while EW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VIVAX Vanguard Value Index Fund	1.93%	1.42%	2.19%	2.33%	2.39%	2.02%	2.43%	2.39%	2.59%	2.18%	2.33%	2.46%
EW Edwards Lifesciences Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

VIVAX vs. EW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIVAX drawdown since its inception was -59.38%, which is greater than EW's maximum drawdown of -54.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIVAX and EW.

Drawdown Indicators

	VIVAX	EW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.38%	-54.32%	-5.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.28%	-12.73%	+1.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.17%	-54.32%	+37.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.81%	-54.32%	+17.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.37%	-38.72%	+32.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.11%	-14.31%	+6.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.49%	4.59%	-2.10%

Volatility

VIVAX vs. EW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Value Index Fund (VIVAX) is 3.27%, while Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW) has a volatility of 7.98%. This indicates that VIVAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VIVAX	EW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.27%	7.98%	-4.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.54%	17.39%	-9.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.83%	24.07%	-9.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.91%	32.48%	-18.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.74%	32.59%	-15.85%