PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VITPX vs. FSMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VITPX vs. FSMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX) and Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VITPX achieves a 9.88% return, which is significantly lower than FSMAX's 13.84% return. Over the past 10 years, VITPX has outperformed FSMAX with an annualized return of 14.54%, while FSMAX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.60% annualized return.


VITPX

1D
1.63%
1M
-0.78%
6M
8.17%
YTD
9.88%
1Y
21.14%
3Y*
19.14%
5Y*
11.94%
10Y*
14.54%
ALL TIME*
9.60%

FSMAX

1D
1.41%
1M
-2.65%
6M
11.17%
YTD
13.84%
1Y
23.61%
3Y*
15.94%
5Y*
6.17%
10Y*
11.60%
ALL TIME*
12.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

VITPX vs. FSMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VITPX
Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
9.88%17.17%25.43%26.01%-19.48%25.76%20.95%30.87%-5.59%20.51%
FSMAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund
13.84%11.40%16.99%25.36%-26.44%12.41%32.28%28.01%-9.44%18.04%

Correlation

The correlation between VITPX and FSMAX is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2011

0.92

The correlation between VITPX and FSMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VITPX vs. FSMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VITPX
VITPX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VITPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VITPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VITPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VITPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VITPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMAX
FSMAX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FSMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VITPX vs. FSMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX) and Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VITPXFSMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.20

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

2.00

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.11

6.80

+2.31

VITPX vs. FSMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VITPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the FSMAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VITPX and FSMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VITPX vs. FSMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VITPX drawdown since its inception was -55.28%, which is greater than FSMAX's maximum drawdown of -50.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VITPX and FSMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VITPXFSMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.28%

-50.55%

-4.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-10.26%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.35%

-26.82%

+7.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.31%

-36.31%

+11.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.99%

-50.55%

+15.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.88%

-3.77%

+1.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.98%

-12.06%

+4.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

3.02%

-0.96%

Volatility

VITPX vs. FSMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX) is 3.41%, while Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX) has a volatility of 3.90%. This indicates that VITPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VITPXFSMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

3.90%

-0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.27%

13.31%

-3.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.13%

17.80%

-4.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.46%

22.39%

-4.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.41%

30.22%

-11.81%

VITPX vs. FSMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VITPX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than FSMAX's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VITPX vs. FSMAX - Dividend Comparison

VITPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, more than FSMAX's 0.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSMAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund
0.50%0.57%0.48%1.17%1.90%7.49%2.14%4.30%6.09%5.44%4.85%6.34%
VITPX
Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
2.33%2.64%4.14%2.41%6.48%5.38%11.57%2.91%3.93%1.90%2.80%2.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


VITPX and FSMAX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSMAX has higher volatility (3.90%) compared to VITPX (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VITPX dropped -55.28% vs FSMAX's -50.55%.

VITPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VITPX and FSMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer