PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VITNX vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VITNX vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Shares (VITNX) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VITNX achieves a 8.81% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 42.40% return. Over the past 10 years, VITNX has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 15.19%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 46.45% annualized return.


VITNX

1D
-0.04%
1M
-1.54%
YTD
8.81%
6M
7.34%
1Y
22.96%
3Y*
21.16%
5Y*
12.15%
10Y*
15.19%

TQQQ

1D
2.25%
1M
-8.54%
YTD
42.40%
6M
35.61%
1Y
91.80%
3Y*
60.52%
5Y*
21.71%
10Y*
46.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VITNX vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VITNX
Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Shares
8.81%17.16%25.42%26.01%-19.47%25.76%20.95%30.86%-5.60%20.52%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
42.40%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between VITNX and TQQQ is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010

0.90

The correlation between VITNX and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

VITNX vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VITNX
TQQQ

Technology

36.9%
53.8%

Financial Services

11.2%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
12.3%

Communication Services

9.6%
15.8%

Industrials

9.1%
2.8%

Healthcare

9.0%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
7.7%

Energy

3.4%
0.6%

Utilities

2.5%
1.4%

Real Estate

2.2%
0.1%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.1%

Technology

VITNX
36.9%
TQQQ
53.8%

Financial Services

VITNX
11.2%
TQQQ
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VITNX
9.6%
TQQQ
12.3%

Communication Services

VITNX
9.6%
TQQQ
15.8%

Industrials

VITNX
9.1%
TQQQ
2.8%

Healthcare

VITNX
9.0%
TQQQ
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

VITNX
4.3%
TQQQ
7.7%

Energy

VITNX
3.4%
TQQQ
0.6%

Utilities

VITNX
2.5%
TQQQ
1.4%

Real Estate

VITNX
2.2%
TQQQ
0.1%

Basic Materials

VITNX
1.9%
TQQQ
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VITNX vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VITNX
VITNX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VITNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VITNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
VITNX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VITNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VITNX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VITNX vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Shares (VITNX) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VITNXTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.29

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

2.50

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.41

7.89

+3.52

VITNX vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VITNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VITNX and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VITNX vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VITNX drawdown since its inception was -55.32%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VITNX and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VITNXTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.32%

-81.66%

+26.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-36.97%

+28.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.36%

-58.04%

+38.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.32%

-81.66%

+56.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.99%

-81.66%

+46.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.83%

-14.07%

+11.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.34%

-18.49%

+11.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

11.67%

-9.67%

Volatility

VITNX vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Shares (VITNX) is 4.95%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 26.81%. This indicates that VITNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VITNXTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.95%

26.81%

-21.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.09%

43.27%

-33.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.86%

53.22%

-40.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.45%

67.42%

-49.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.43%

66.30%

-47.87%

VITNX vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

VITNX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

VITNX vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

VITNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, more than TQQQ's 0.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.27%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%
VITNX
Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Shares
2.29%2.63%4.14%2.41%6.48%5.37%11.56%2.90%3.92%1.89%2.78%2.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, VITNX and TQQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TQQQ has higher volatility (26.81%) compared to VITNX (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VITNX dropped -55.32% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

VITNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VITNX and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer