VISGX vs. VB
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Fund (VISGX) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB).
VISGX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on May 21, 1998. VB is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Small Cap. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004.
Performance
VISGX vs. VB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VISGX vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VISGX Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.23% | 8.18% | 14.80% | 22.91% | -28.50% | 5.58% | 35.11% | 32.60% | -5.81% | 21.78% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 2.50% | 8.87% | 14.17% | 18.22% | -17.51% | 17.57% | 19.19% | 27.34% | -9.34% | 16.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VISGX achieves a 0.23% return, which is significantly lower than VB's 2.50% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VISGX having a 10.31% annualized return and VB not far ahead at 10.57%.
VISGX
- 1D
- 4.35%
- 1M
- -6.40%
- YTD
- 0.23%
- 6M
- 1.43%
- 1Y
- 20.03%
- 3Y*
- 12.25%
- 5Y*
- 2.02%
- 10Y*
- 10.31%
VB
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -5.14%
- YTD
- 2.50%
- 6M
- 4.07%
- 1Y
- 20.05%
- 3Y*
- 13.25%
- 5Y*
- 5.47%
- 10Y*
- 10.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VISGX vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison
VISGX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
VISGX vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank
VISGX
VB
VISGX vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Fund (VISGX) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VISGX | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.84 | 0.92 | -0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.33 | 1.43 | -0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.19 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 1.43 | -0.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.51 | 6.12 | -0.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VISGX | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 0.92 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.26 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.50 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.42 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between VISGX and VB is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
VISGX vs. VB - Dividend Comparison
VISGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than VB's 1.33% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VISGX Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.40% | 0.33% | 0.42% | 0.56% | 0.46% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.47% | 0.65% | 0.71% | 0.97% | 0.84% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.33% | 1.33% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Drawdowns
VISGX vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VISGX drawdown since its inception was -58.74%, roughly equal to the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VISGX and VB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VISGX | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.74% | -59.56% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.49% | -14.29% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.41% | -28.15% | -10.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.70% | -42.05% | +3.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.54% | -5.55% | -1.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.67% | -8.49% | -3.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.63% | 3.34% | +0.29% |
Volatility
VISGX vs. VB - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Fund (VISGX) has a higher volatility of 8.86% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) at 6.72%. This indicates that VISGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VISGX | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.86% | 6.72% | +2.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.70% | 12.62% | +3.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.53% | 21.87% | +2.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.56% | 20.77% | +2.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.92% | 21.40% | +1.52% |