VISGX vs. VB
VISGX (Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Fund) and VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) are both funds - VISGX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Vanguard, while VB is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Index. Over the past 10 years, VISGX returned 12.05%/yr vs 11.70%/yr for VB. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VISGX charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VB.
Performance
VISGX vs. VB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VISGX achieves a 18.66% return, which is significantly higher than VB's 14.80% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VISGX having a 12.05% annualized return and VB not far behind at 11.70%.
VISGX
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 3.09%
- YTD
- 18.66%
- 6M
- 15.65%
- 1Y
- 32.31%
- 3Y*
- 18.02%
- 5Y*
- 4.96%
- 10Y*
- 12.05%
VB
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 2.05%
- YTD
- 14.80%
- 6M
- 12.69%
- 1Y
- 28.03%
- 3Y*
- 17.24%
- 5Y*
- 6.99%
- 10Y*
- 11.70%
VISGX vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VISGX Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Fund | 18.66% | 8.18% | 14.80% | 22.91% | -28.50% | 5.58% | 35.11% | 32.60% | -5.81% | 21.78% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 14.80% | 8.87% | 14.17% | 18.22% | -17.51% | 17.57% | 19.19% | 27.34% | -9.34% | 16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between VISGX and VB is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.96 |
The correlation between VISGX and VB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VISGX vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank
VISGX
VB
VISGX vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Fund (VISGX) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VISGX | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.29 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 3.14 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.93 | 11.50 | -0.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VISGX vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VISGX drawdown since its inception was -58.74%, roughly equal to the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VISGX and VB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VISGX | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.74% | -59.56% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.39% | -8.98% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.58% | -25.36% | -2.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.41% | -28.15% | -10.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.70% | -42.05% | +3.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -1.15% | +1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.59% | -8.42% | -3.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 2.44% | +0.60% |
Volatility
VISGX vs. VB - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Fund (VISGX) has a higher volatility of 6.94% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) at 4.99%. This indicates that VISGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VISGX | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.94% | 4.99% | +1.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.80% | 12.24% | +3.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.32% | 16.65% | +3.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.70% | 20.79% | +2.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.06% | 21.42% | +1.64% |
VISGX vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison
VISGX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VISGX vs. VB - Dividend Comparison
VISGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than VB's 1.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.19% | 1.33% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
VISGX Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.34% | 0.33% | 0.42% | 0.56% | 0.46% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.47% | 0.65% | 0.71% | 0.97% | 0.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, VISGX and VB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VISGX has higher volatility (6.94%) compared to VB (4.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VISGX dropped -58.74% vs VB's -59.56%.
VB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VISGX and VB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer