VIS vs. MGC
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC).
VIS and MGC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VIS is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index. It was launched on Sep 23, 2004. MGC is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Mega Cap Index. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007. Both VIS and MGC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VIS or MGC.
Key characteristics
| VIS | MGC | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 25.99% | 28.52% |
| 1Y Return | 44.51% | 40.70% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 11.54% | 10.70% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 14.01% | 16.78% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 11.85% | 13.98% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.02 | 3.08 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.20 | 4.05 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.53 | 1.58 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.97 | 4.35 |
| Martin Ratio | 20.25 | 19.97 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.17% | 1.98% |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.58% | 12.86% |
| Max Drawdown | -63.51% | -52.20% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIS and MGC is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VIS vs. MGC - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, VIS achieves a 25.99% return, which is significantly lower than MGC's 28.52% return. Over the past 10 years, VIS has underperformed MGC with an annualized return of 11.85%, while MGC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.98% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VIS vs. MGC - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIS has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than MGC's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VIS vs. MGC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VIS vs. MGC - Dividend Comparison
VIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, which matches MGC's 1.15% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 1.15% | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.69% | 1.91% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 1.94% | 1.57% | 1.06% |
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.65% | 1.17% | 1.45% | 1.81% | 2.10% | 1.82% | 2.14% | 2.11% | 1.81% | 1.86% |
Drawdowns
VIS vs. MGC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIS drawdown since its inception was -63.51%, which is greater than MGC's maximum drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIS and MGC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VIS vs. MGC - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) has a higher volatility of 5.44% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) at 4.19%. This indicates that VIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.