PortfoliosLab logo
VIRS vs. PPH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between VIRS and PPH is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

VIRS vs. PPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer BioThreat Strategy ETF (VIRS) and VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


VIRS

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

PPH

YTD

2.57%

1M

0.95%

6M

-1.36%

1Y

-0.90%

3Y*

5.53%

5Y*

8.78%

10Y*

3.85%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Pacer BioThreat Strategy ETF

VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF

VIRS vs. PPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIRS has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than PPH's 0.36% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

VIRS vs. PPH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIRS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VIRS is 8080
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VIRS is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VIRS is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VIRS is 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VIRS is 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VIRS is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

PPH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PPH is 1717
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PPH is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PPH is 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PPH is 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PPH is 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PPH is 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

VIRS vs. PPH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer BioThreat Strategy ETF (VIRS) and VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

VIRS vs. PPH - Dividend Comparison

VIRS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
VIRS
Pacer BioThreat Strategy ETF
0.44%0.63%0.97%0.00%0.67%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PPH
VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF
1.93%1.98%2.09%1.55%1.62%1.66%1.77%1.97%1.92%2.43%1.93%1.71%

Drawdowns

VIRS vs. PPH - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

VIRS vs. PPH - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...