PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
VIRS vs. BDGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VIRS vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer BioThreat Strategy ETF (VIRS) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
11.05%
12.78%
VIRS
BDGS

Returns By Period


VIRS

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y (annualized)

N/A

10Y (annualized)

N/A

BDGS

YTD

16.97%

1M

2.70%

6M

12.79%

1Y

18.92%

5Y (annualized)

N/A

10Y (annualized)

N/A

Key characteristics


VIRSBDGS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VIRS vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIRS has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.


BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
Expense ratio chart for BDGS: current value at 0.85% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.85%
Expense ratio chart for VIRS: current value at 0.70% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.70%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between VIRS and BDGS is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

VIRS vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer BioThreat Strategy ETF (VIRS) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VIRS, currently valued at 3.49, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.494.10
The chart of Sortino ratio for VIRS, currently valued at 5.08, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.005.097.83
The chart of Omega ratio for VIRS, currently valued at 1.71, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.712.51
The chart of Calmar ratio for VIRS, currently valued at 4.73, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.737.50
The chart of Martin ratio for VIRS, currently valued at 20.54, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0020.5445.30
VIRS
BDGS

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.49
4.10
VIRS
BDGS

Dividends

VIRS vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

VIRS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BDGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%.


TTM2023202220212020
VIRS
Pacer BioThreat Strategy ETF
0.83%0.97%0.00%0.67%0.31%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
0.72%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

VIRS vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison


-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember0
-0.75%
VIRS
BDGS

Volatility

VIRS vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer BioThreat Strategy ETF (VIRS) is 0.00%, while Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) has a volatility of 2.48%. This indicates that VIRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember0
2.48%
VIRS
BDGS