VIRS vs. BDGS
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer BioThreat Strategy ETF (VIRS) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS).
VIRS and BDGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VIRS is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the LifeSci BioThreat Strategy Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2020. BDGS is an actively managed fund by Bridges. It was launched on May 10, 2023.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VIRS or BDGS.
Correlation
The correlation between VIRS and BDGS is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
VIRS vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
Returns By Period
VIRS
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
BDGS
2.51%
2.51%
11.09%
21.18%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VIRS vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIRS has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VIRS vs. BDGS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
VIRS
BDGS
VIRS vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer BioThreat Strategy ETF (VIRS) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VIRS vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison
VIRS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BDGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIRS Pacer BioThreat Strategy ETF | 0.63% | 0.63% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 0.31% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 1.77% | 1.81% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
VIRS vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison
Volatility
VIRS vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer BioThreat Strategy ETF (VIRS) is 0.00%, while Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) has a volatility of 2.60%. This indicates that VIRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.