VIPSX vs. BNDW
VIPSX (Vanguard Inflation-Protected Securities Fund Investor Shares) and BNDW (Vanguard Total World Bond ETF) are both funds - VIPSX is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund managed by Vanguard, while BNDW is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Float Adjusted Composite Index. Over the past 5 years, VIPSX returned 0.78%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for BNDW. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VIPSX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for BNDW.
Performance
VIPSX vs. BNDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIPSX achieves a 0.65% return, which is significantly lower than BNDW's 0.88% return.
VIPSX
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 0.65%
- 6M
- 0.83%
- 1Y
- 3.43%
- 3Y*
- 3.52%
- 5Y*
- 0.78%
- 10Y*
- 2.39%
BNDW
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 0.88%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 3.23%
- 3Y*
- 4.10%
- 5Y*
- 0.27%
- 10Y*
- —
VIPSX vs. BNDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIPSX Vanguard Inflation-Protected Securities Fund Investor Shares | 0.65% | 6.77% | 1.74% | 3.73% | -12.04% | 5.57% | 10.90% | 8.06% | -1.24% |
BNDW Vanguard Total World Bond ETF | 0.88% | 5.02% | 2.42% | 7.18% | -12.88% | -2.10% | 6.22% | 8.37% | 1.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIPSX and BNDW is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2018 | 0.76 |
The correlation between VIPSX and BNDW shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (all time) to 0.86 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIPSX vs. BNDW — Risk / Return Rank
VIPSX
BNDW
VIPSX vs. BNDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Inflation-Protected Securities Fund Investor Shares (VIPSX) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VIPSX | BNDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.17 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 1.20 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.28 | 3.24 | +2.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VIPSX vs. BNDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIPSX drawdown since its inception was -15.13%, smaller than the maximum BNDW drawdown of -17.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIPSX and BNDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIPSX | BNDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.13% | -17.22% | +2.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.02% | -2.70% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.57% | -4.27% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.55% | -16.93% | +2.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | -1.08% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.23% | -4.95% | +1.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.67% | 1.00% | -0.33% |
Volatility
VIPSX vs. BNDW - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Inflation-Protected Securities Fund Investor Shares (VIPSX) has a higher volatility of 1.23% compared to Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) at 0.92%. This indicates that VIPSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIPSX | BNDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | 0.92% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.50% | 2.70% | -0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.40% | 3.35% | +0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.98% | 5.22% | +0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.34% | 4.89% | +0.45% |
VIPSX vs. BNDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIPSX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDW's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VIPSX vs. BNDW - Dividend Comparison
VIPSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than BNDW's 4.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDW Vanguard Total World Bond ETF | 4.19% | 4.12% | 3.90% | 3.73% | 2.02% | 2.58% | 1.56% | 3.05% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VIPSX Vanguard Inflation-Protected Securities Fund Investor Shares | 4.43% | 4.64% | 4.07% | 4.20% | 8.34% | 5.03% | 1.28% | 2.22% | 3.03% | 2.32% | 3.38% | 0.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIPSX and BNDW have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VIPSX has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to BNDW (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIPSX dropped -15.13% vs BNDW's -17.22%.
VIPSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIPSX and BNDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer