PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIOV vs. VTWV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIOV vs. VTWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIOV achieves a 17.84% return, which is significantly lower than VTWV's 21.24% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VIOV having a 10.69% annualized return and VTWV not far ahead at 10.91%.


VIOV

1D
-0.11%
1M
3.21%
YTD
17.84%
6M
15.63%
1Y
39.61%
3Y*
15.67%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
10.69%

VTWV

1D
0.55%
1M
3.72%
YTD
21.24%
6M
18.40%
1Y
45.20%
3Y*
19.74%
5Y*
7.74%
10Y*
10.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIOV vs. VTWV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VIOV
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
17.84%6.63%7.44%15.36%-11.37%30.67%2.81%24.44%-12.85%11.54%
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
21.24%12.72%7.83%14.67%-14.46%27.90%4.88%22.44%-13.34%8.06%

Correlation

The correlation between VIOV and VTWV is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.92

The correlation between VIOV and VTWV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

VIOV vs. VTWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VIOV
VTWV

Financial Services

19.5%
24.0%

Consumer Cyclical

15.4%
8.9%

Technology

13.5%
11.6%

Industrials

11.6%
12.2%

Real Estate

8.6%
10.2%

Healthcare

7.3%
10.1%

Energy

7.0%
7.8%

Basic Materials

6.7%
5.4%

Communication Services

4.4%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
2.1%

Utilities

2.1%
5.0%

Financial Services

VIOV
19.5%
VTWV
24.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VIOV
15.4%
VTWV
8.9%

Technology

VIOV
13.5%
VTWV
11.6%

Industrials

VIOV
11.6%
VTWV
12.2%

Real Estate

VIOV
8.6%
VTWV
10.2%

Healthcare

VIOV
7.3%
VTWV
10.1%

Energy

VIOV
7.0%
VTWV
7.8%

Basic Materials

VIOV
6.7%
VTWV
5.4%

Communication Services

VIOV
4.4%
VTWV
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

VIOV
3.9%
VTWV
2.1%

Utilities

VIOV
2.1%
VTWV
5.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIOV vs. VTWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIOV
VIOV Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VIOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIOV Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VIOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIOV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

VTWV
VTWV Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VTWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWV Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWV Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIOV vs. VTWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VIOVVTWVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.41

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.27

5.26

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.99

17.96

-3.98

VIOV vs. VTWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIOV Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the VTWV Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIOV and VTWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VIOV vs. VTWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIOV drawdown since its inception was -47.36%, roughly equal to the maximum VTWV drawdown of -45.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIOV and VTWV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIOVVTWVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.36%

-45.73%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.33%

-8.64%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.44%

-26.72%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.44%

-26.72%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.36%

-45.73%

-1.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

0.00%

-1.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.36%

-7.79%

+0.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

2.52%

+0.32%

Volatility

VIOV vs. VTWV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV) is 4.73%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) has a volatility of 5.32%. This indicates that VIOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIOVVTWVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

5.32%

-0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.81%

12.61%

-0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.48%

18.46%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.90%

21.71%

+0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.91%

23.57%

+0.34%

VIOV vs. VTWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VIOV and VTWV have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VIOV vs. VTWV - Dividend Comparison

VIOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than VTWV's 1.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VIOV
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
1.56%1.69%1.78%2.18%1.81%1.59%1.42%1.60%1.76%1.43%1.17%1.32%
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
1.63%1.79%1.78%2.02%2.07%1.60%1.49%1.82%2.04%1.63%1.57%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, VIOV and VTWV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTWV has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to VIOV (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIOV dropped -47.36% vs VTWV's -45.73%.

On 10-year performance, VTWV leads with 10.91% vs 10.69% for VIOV. Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. On volatility, VIOV has been the lower-risk option at 4.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTWV has performed better with a 10.91% return vs 10.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIOV and VTWV have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

VTWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 1.56% for VIOV.

VIOV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while VTWV tracks Russell 2000 Value Index.

VTWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIOV and VTWV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer