VIOV vs. VTWV
VIOV (Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF) and VTWV (Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds from Vanguard - VIOV tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index while VTWV tracks the Russell 2000 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VIOV returned 10.69%/yr vs 10.91%/yr for VTWV. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.10% expense ratio.
Performance
VIOV vs. VTWV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIOV achieves a 17.84% return, which is significantly lower than VTWV's 21.24% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VIOV having a 10.69% annualized return and VTWV not far ahead at 10.91%.
VIOV
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 3.21%
- YTD
- 17.84%
- 6M
- 15.63%
- 1Y
- 39.61%
- 3Y*
- 15.67%
- 5Y*
- 6.67%
- 10Y*
- 10.69%
VTWV
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 3.72%
- YTD
- 21.24%
- 6M
- 18.40%
- 1Y
- 45.20%
- 3Y*
- 19.74%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
VIOV vs. VTWV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIOV Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | 17.84% | 6.63% | 7.44% | 15.36% | -11.37% | 30.67% | 2.81% | 24.44% | -12.85% | 11.54% |
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 21.24% | 12.72% | 7.83% | 14.67% | -14.46% | 27.90% | 4.88% | 22.44% | -13.34% | 8.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIOV and VTWV is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010 | 0.92 |
The correlation between VIOV and VTWV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
VIOV vs. VTWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VIOV
VTWV
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
VIOV
VTWV
Consumer Cyclical
VIOV
VTWV
Technology
VIOV
VTWV
Industrials
VIOV
VTWV
Real Estate
VIOV
VTWV
Healthcare
VIOV
VTWV
Energy
VIOV
VTWV
Basic Materials
VIOV
VTWV
Communication Services
VIOV
VTWV
Consumer Defensive
VIOV
VTWV
Utilities
VIOV
VTWV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIOV vs. VTWV — Risk / Return Rank
VIOV
VTWV
VIOV vs. VTWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VIOV | VTWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.41 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.27 | 5.26 | -0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.99 | 17.96 | -3.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VIOV vs. VTWV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIOV drawdown since its inception was -47.36%, roughly equal to the maximum VTWV drawdown of -45.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIOV and VTWV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIOV | VTWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.36% | -45.73% | -1.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.33% | -8.64% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.44% | -26.72% | -1.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.44% | -26.72% | -1.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.36% | -45.73% | -1.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.32% | 0.00% | -1.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.36% | -7.79% | +0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 2.52% | +0.32% |
Volatility
VIOV vs. VTWV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV) is 4.73%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) has a volatility of 5.32%. This indicates that VIOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIOV | VTWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.73% | 5.32% | -0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.81% | 12.61% | -0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.48% | 18.46% | +0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 21.71% | +0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.91% | 23.57% | +0.34% |
VIOV vs. VTWV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VIOV and VTWV have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VIOV vs. VTWV - Dividend Comparison
VIOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than VTWV's 1.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIOV Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | 1.56% | 1.69% | 1.78% | 2.18% | 1.81% | 1.59% | 1.42% | 1.60% | 1.76% | 1.43% | 1.17% | 1.32% |
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.63% | 1.79% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.07% | 1.60% | 1.49% | 1.82% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 1.57% | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, VIOV and VTWV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VTWV has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to VIOV (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIOV dropped -47.36% vs VTWV's -45.73%.
On 10-year performance, VTWV leads with 10.91% vs 10.69% for VIOV. Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. On volatility, VIOV has been the lower-risk option at 4.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTWV has performed better with a 10.91% return vs 10.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIOV and VTWV have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.
VTWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 1.56% for VIOV.
VIOV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while VTWV tracks Russell 2000 Value Index.
VTWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIOV and VTWV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer