PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIOV vs. VONV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIOV vs. VONV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIOV achieves a 15.28% return, which is significantly higher than VONV's 14.28% return. Over the past 10 years, VIOV has underperformed VONV with an annualized return of 10.23%, while VONV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.35% annualized return.


VIOV

1D
-1.28%
1M
2.26%
YTD
15.28%
6M
14.76%
1Y
37.06%
3Y*
14.29%
5Y*
5.75%
10Y*
10.23%

VONV

1D
0.00%
1M
4.28%
YTD
14.28%
6M
14.88%
1Y
28.35%
3Y*
18.56%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
11.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIOV vs. VONV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VIOV
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
15.28%6.63%7.44%15.36%-11.37%30.67%2.81%24.44%-12.85%11.54%
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
14.28%15.81%14.28%11.40%-7.65%25.28%2.71%26.48%-8.45%13.59%

Correlation

The correlation between VIOV and VONV is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.82

The correlation between VIOV and VONV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

VIOV vs. VONV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VIOV
VONV

Financial Services

19.8%
18.9%

Consumer Cyclical

15.4%
7.3%

Industrials

12.7%
13.1%

Technology

10.6%
14.9%

Energy

9.1%
7.0%

Real Estate

8.8%
4.1%

Healthcare

7.5%
10.9%

Basic Materials

6.3%
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
7.2%

Communication Services

3.4%
8.5%

Utilities

1.9%
4.4%

Financial Services

VIOV
19.8%
VONV
18.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VIOV
15.4%
VONV
7.3%

Industrials

VIOV
12.7%
VONV
13.1%

Technology

VIOV
10.6%
VONV
14.9%

Energy

VIOV
9.1%
VONV
7.0%

Real Estate

VIOV
8.8%
VONV
4.1%

Healthcare

VIOV
7.5%
VONV
10.9%

Basic Materials

VIOV
6.3%
VONV
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

VIOV
3.8%
VONV
7.2%

Communication Services

VIOV
3.4%
VONV
8.5%

Utilities

VIOV
1.9%
VONV
4.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIOV vs. VONV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIOV
VIOV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VIOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIOV Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VIOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIOV Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

VONV
VONV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VONV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VONV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIOV vs. VONV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VIOVVONVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.48

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.99

4.18

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.00

17.54

-4.54

VIOV vs. VONV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIOV Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the VONV Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIOV and VONV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VIOVVONVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

2.64

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.70

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.66

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.71

-0.18

Drawdowns

VIOV vs. VONV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIOV drawdown since its inception was -47.36%, which is greater than VONV's maximum drawdown of -38.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIOV and VONV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIOVVONVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.36%

-38.21%

-9.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.33%

-6.81%

-2.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.44%

-15.70%

-12.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.44%

-18.87%

-9.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.36%

-38.21%

-9.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.28%

0.00%

-1.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.38%

-3.91%

-3.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

1.62%

+1.24%

Volatility

VIOV vs. VONV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) at 2.94%. This indicates that VIOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIOVVONVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

2.94%

+1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.57%

8.09%

+3.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.41%

10.81%

+7.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.95%

14.77%

+7.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.89%

17.24%

+6.65%

VIOV vs. VONV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIOV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VONV's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VIOV vs. VONV - Dividend Comparison

VIOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than VONV's 1.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VIOV
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
1.59%1.69%1.78%2.18%1.81%1.59%1.42%1.60%1.76%1.43%1.17%1.32%
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
1.63%1.82%1.97%2.10%2.22%1.67%2.25%2.30%2.56%2.18%2.39%2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


VIOV and VONV have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VIOV has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to VONV (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIOV dropped -47.36% vs VONV's -38.21%.

On 10-year performance, VONV leads with 11.35% vs 10.23% for VIOV. On fees, VONV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VONV has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VONV has performed better with a 11.35% return vs 10.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VONV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VIOV.

VONV has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 1.59% for VIOV.

VIOV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while VONV is Large Cap Value Equities. VIOV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while VONV tracks Russell 1000 Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VIOV and 0.06% for VONV.

VONV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIOV and VONV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer