PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIOO vs. SLYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIOO vs. SLYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF (VIOO) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VIOO having a 16.37% return and SLYG slightly lower at 16.17%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VIOO having a 10.77% annualized return and SLYG not far ahead at 10.90%.


VIOO

1D
0.91%
1M
1.63%
YTD
16.37%
6M
16.85%
1Y
34.98%
3Y*
14.74%
5Y*
5.91%
10Y*
10.77%

SLYG

1D
0.65%
1M
0.91%
YTD
16.17%
6M
16.01%
1Y
28.60%
3Y*
14.69%
5Y*
5.73%
10Y*
10.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIOO vs. SLYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VIOO
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF
16.37%6.04%8.48%16.16%-16.26%26.79%11.47%22.68%-8.65%13.16%
SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
16.17%5.20%9.38%17.27%-21.26%22.42%19.48%20.97%-4.20%14.62%

Correlation

The correlation between VIOO and SLYG is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.95

The correlation between VIOO and SLYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

VIOO vs. SLYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VIOO
SLYG

Financial Services

16.9%
13.9%

Industrials

15.5%
19.5%

Technology

15.5%
20.1%

Consumer Cyclical

13.4%
10.4%

Healthcare

11.0%
14.4%

Real Estate

7.7%
6.4%

Energy

5.9%
5.1%

Basic Materials

5.1%
2.8%

Communication Services

3.6%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
2.8%

Utilities

2.0%
1.9%

Financial Services

VIOO
16.9%
SLYG
13.9%

Industrials

VIOO
15.5%
SLYG
19.5%

Technology

VIOO
15.5%
SLYG
20.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VIOO
13.4%
SLYG
10.4%

Healthcare

VIOO
11.0%
SLYG
14.4%

Real Estate

VIOO
7.7%
SLYG
6.4%

Energy

VIOO
5.9%
SLYG
5.1%

Basic Materials

VIOO
5.1%
SLYG
2.8%

Communication Services

VIOO
3.6%
SLYG
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

VIOO
3.5%
SLYG
2.8%

Utilities

VIOO
2.0%
SLYG
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIOO vs. SLYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIOO
VIOO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VIOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIOO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VIOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SLYG
SLYG Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
SLYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYG Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIOO vs. SLYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF (VIOO) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VIOOSLYGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.00

1.64

+0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.88

2.41

+0.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.29

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.93

3.14

+0.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.17

11.01

+2.16

VIOO vs. SLYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the SLYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIOO and SLYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VIOOSLYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

1.64

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.27

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.48

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.31

+0.27

Drawdowns

VIOO vs. SLYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIOO drawdown since its inception was -44.15%, smaller than the maximum SLYG drawdown of -62.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIOO and SLYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIOOSLYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.15%

-62.15%

+18.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.77%

-9.10%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.93%

-27.39%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.93%

-29.18%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.15%

-41.86%

-2.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-0.84%

+0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.34%

-14.55%

+7.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

2.60%

+0.02%

Volatility

VIOO vs. SLYG - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF (VIOO) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) have volatilities of 4.40% and 4.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIOOSLYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

4.60%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.69%

12.48%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.57%

17.56%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.40%

21.52%

-0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.99%

22.74%

+0.25%

VIOO vs. SLYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIOO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SLYG's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VIOO vs. SLYG - Dividend Comparison

VIOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, more than SLYG's 0.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
0.71%0.86%1.22%1.18%1.18%0.68%0.71%1.08%1.06%4.74%1.13%5.75%
VIOO
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF
1.17%1.36%1.48%1.47%1.51%1.16%1.09%1.37%1.32%1.11%1.06%1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, VIOO and SLYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SLYG has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to VIOO (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIOO dropped -44.15% vs SLYG's -62.15%.

On 10-year performance, SLYG leads with 10.90% vs 10.77% for VIOO. On fees, VIOO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VIOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLYG has performed better with a 10.90% return vs 10.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIOO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SLYG.

VIOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.71% for SLYG.

VIOO is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while SLYG is Small Cap Growth Equities. VIOO tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while SLYG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VIOO and 0.15% for SLYG.

VIOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIOO and SLYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer