VIG vs. NOBL
VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both Dividend funds - VIG tracks the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index while NOBL tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VIG returned 13.23%/yr vs 9.51%/yr for NOBL. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VIG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.
Performance
VIG vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIG achieves a 7.57% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 3.51% return. Over the past 10 years, VIG has outperformed NOBL with an annualized return of 13.23%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively lower 9.51% annualized return.
VIG
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 3.79%
- YTD
- 7.57%
- 6M
- 6.99%
- 1Y
- 19.63%
- 3Y*
- 16.49%
- 5Y*
- 10.62%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
NOBL
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 3.51%
- 6M
- 3.45%
- 1Y
- 9.00%
- 3Y*
- 8.01%
- 5Y*
- 5.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.51%
VIG vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 7.57% | 14.17% | 16.99% | 14.51% | -9.80% | 23.76% | 15.43% | 29.62% | -2.08% | 22.22% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 3.51% | 6.84% | 6.72% | 8.09% | -6.52% | 25.46% | 8.35% | 27.39% | -3.26% | 21.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIG and NOBL is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2013 | 0.91 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VIG and NOBL has dropped to 0.71 - well below their long-term average of 0.91, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VIG vs. NOBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VIG
NOBL
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
VIG
NOBL
Financial Services
VIG
NOBL
Healthcare
VIG
NOBL
Industrials
VIG
NOBL
Consumer Defensive
VIG
NOBL
Consumer Cyclical
VIG
NOBL
Energy
VIG
NOBL
Basic Materials
VIG
NOBL
Utilities
VIG
NOBL
Communication Services
VIG
NOBL
-
Real Estate
VIG
-
NOBL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIG vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank
VIG
NOBL
VIG vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VIG | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.14 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 0.99 | +1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.06 | 2.58 | +7.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VIG | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 0.80 | +1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.35 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 0.57 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.64 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
VIG vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIG drawdown since its inception was -46.81%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIG and NOBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIG | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.81% | -35.43% | -11.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.91% | -9.11% | +1.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.95% | -15.36% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.39% | -17.92% | -2.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.72% | -35.43% | +3.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -5.99% | +5.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.51% | -3.48% | -2.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 3.50% | -1.54% |
Volatility
VIG vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) is 2.19%, while ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) has a volatility of 2.36%. This indicates that VIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIG | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.19% | 2.36% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.57% | 8.00% | -0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.01% | 11.33% | -1.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.23% | 14.38% | -0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 16.60% | -0.55% |
VIG vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
VIG vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
VIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than NOBL's 2.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.12% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1.47% | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.96% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.08% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIG and NOBL have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NOBL has higher volatility (2.36%) compared to VIG (2.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIG dropped -46.81% vs NOBL's -35.43%.
On 10-year performance, VIG leads with 13.23% vs 9.51% for NOBL. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VIG has performed better with a 13.23% return vs 9.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NOBL.
NOBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 1.47% for VIG.
VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VIG and 0.35% for NOBL.
VIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIG and NOBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer