PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIG vs. NOBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIG vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIG achieves a 7.57% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 3.51% return. Over the past 10 years, VIG has outperformed NOBL with an annualized return of 13.23%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively lower 9.51% annualized return.


VIG

1D
-0.19%
1M
3.79%
YTD
7.57%
6M
6.99%
1Y
19.63%
3Y*
16.49%
5Y*
10.62%
10Y*
13.23%

NOBL

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.01%
YTD
3.51%
6M
3.45%
1Y
9.00%
3Y*
8.01%
5Y*
5.03%
10Y*
9.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIG vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
7.57%14.17%16.99%14.51%-9.80%23.76%15.43%29.62%-2.08%22.22%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
3.51%6.84%6.72%8.09%-6.52%25.46%8.35%27.39%-3.26%21.02%

Correlation

The correlation between VIG and NOBL is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2013

0.91

Over the past year, the correlation between VIG and NOBL has dropped to 0.71 - well below their long-term average of 0.91, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VIG vs. NOBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VIG
NOBL

Technology

26.2%
3.6%

Financial Services

20.6%
12.4%

Healthcare

16.5%
9.7%

Industrials

11.8%
20.3%

Consumer Defensive

10.1%
23.5%

Consumer Cyclical

4.7%
5.1%

Energy

3.5%
3.4%

Basic Materials

3.5%
10.9%

Utilities

3.2%
6.4%

Communication Services

0.5%

-

Real Estate

-

4.6%

Technology

VIG
26.2%
NOBL
3.6%

Financial Services

VIG
20.6%
NOBL
12.4%

Healthcare

VIG
16.5%
NOBL
9.7%

Industrials

VIG
11.8%
NOBL
20.3%

Consumer Defensive

VIG
10.1%
NOBL
23.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VIG
4.7%
NOBL
5.1%

Energy

VIG
3.5%
NOBL
3.4%

Basic Materials

VIG
3.5%
NOBL
10.9%

Utilities

VIG
3.2%
NOBL
6.4%

Communication Services

VIG
0.5%
NOBL

-

Real Estate

VIG

-

NOBL
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIG vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIG
VIG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIG Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIG Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIG vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VIGNOBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.14

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

0.99

+1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.06

2.58

+7.48

VIG vs. NOBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIG and NOBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VIGNOBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

0.80

+1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.35

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.57

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.64

-0.05

Drawdowns

VIG vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIG drawdown since its inception was -46.81%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIG and NOBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIGNOBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.81%

-35.43%

-11.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.91%

-9.11%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.95%

-15.36%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.39%

-17.92%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.72%

-35.43%

+3.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-5.99%

+5.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.51%

-3.48%

-2.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

3.50%

-1.54%

Volatility

VIG vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) is 2.19%, while ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) has a volatility of 2.36%. This indicates that VIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIGNOBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.19%

2.36%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.57%

8.00%

-0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.01%

11.33%

-1.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.23%

14.38%

-0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.05%

16.60%

-0.55%

VIG vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

VIG vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

VIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than NOBL's 2.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.12%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
1.47%1.62%1.73%1.88%1.96%1.55%1.63%1.71%2.08%1.88%2.14%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


VIG and NOBL have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOBL has higher volatility (2.36%) compared to VIG (2.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIG dropped -46.81% vs NOBL's -35.43%.

On 10-year performance, VIG leads with 13.23% vs 9.51% for NOBL. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VIG has performed better with a 13.23% return vs 9.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NOBL.

NOBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 1.47% for VIG.

VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VIG and 0.35% for NOBL.

VIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIG and NOBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer