VHVG.L vs. XDEM.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L).
VHVG.L and XDEM.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VHVG.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Sep 24, 2019. XDEM.L is a passively managed fund by DWS Investment S.A. (ETF) that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Growth NR USD. It was launched on Sep 5, 2014. Both VHVG.L and XDEM.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VHVG.L or XDEM.L.
Key characteristics
| VHVG.L | XDEM.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 15.27% | 27.81% |
| 1Y Return | 21.97% | 35.12% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.74% | 8.77% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 12.43% | 13.02% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.15 | 2.16 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.96 | 2.80 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.40 | 1.41 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.53 | 2.48 |
| Martin Ratio | 14.69 | 10.28 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.50% | 3.43% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.20% | 16.26% |
| Max Drawdown | -25.41% | -22.42% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.59% | -1.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between VHVG.L and XDEM.L is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VHVG.L vs. XDEM.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, VHVG.L achieves a 15.27% return, which is significantly lower than XDEM.L's 27.81% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VHVG.L vs. XDEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VHVG.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XDEM.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VHVG.L vs. XDEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VHVG.L vs. XDEM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VHVG.L nor XDEM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VHVG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XDEM.L Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.63% |
Drawdowns
VHVG.L vs. XDEM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VHVG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.41%, which is greater than XDEM.L's maximum drawdown of -22.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHVG.L and XDEM.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VHVG.L vs. XDEM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L) is 2.52%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L) has a volatility of 3.30%. This indicates that VHVG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.