VHVE.L vs. FLOA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF USD Acc (VHVE.L) and iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L).
VHVE.L and FLOA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VHVE.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Developed. It was launched on Sep 24, 2019. FLOA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. It was launched on Mar 20, 2018. Both VHVE.L and FLOA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VHVE.L or FLOA.L.
Correlation
The correlation between VHVE.L and FLOA.L is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
VHVE.L vs. FLOA.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
VHVE.L:
1.66
FLOA.L:
4.67
VHVE.L:
2.31
FLOA.L:
7.62
VHVE.L:
1.30
FLOA.L:
2.30
VHVE.L:
2.59
FLOA.L:
8.42
VHVE.L:
10.14
FLOA.L:
89.12
VHVE.L:
1.97%
FLOA.L:
0.07%
VHVE.L:
12.02%
FLOA.L:
1.29%
VHVE.L:
-33.60%
FLOA.L:
-14.96%
VHVE.L:
-0.17%
FLOA.L:
-0.05%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VHVE.L achieves a 4.88% return, which is significantly higher than FLOA.L's 0.69% return.
VHVE.L
4.88%
3.35%
8.02%
19.67%
11.47%
N/A
FLOA.L
0.69%
0.39%
2.87%
5.98%
3.13%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VHVE.L vs. FLOA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VHVE.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than FLOA.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VHVE.L vs. FLOA.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
VHVE.L
FLOA.L
VHVE.L vs. FLOA.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF USD Acc (VHVE.L) and iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VHVE.L vs. FLOA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VHVE.L nor FLOA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
VHVE.L vs. FLOA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VHVE.L drawdown since its inception was -33.60%, which is greater than FLOA.L's maximum drawdown of -14.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHVE.L and FLOA.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VHVE.L vs. FLOA.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF USD Acc (VHVE.L) has a higher volatility of 3.87% compared to iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L) at 0.40%. This indicates that VHVE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLOA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.