PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VHCOX vs. XLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VHCOX vs. XLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Capital Opportunity Fund Investor Shares (VHCOX) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VHCOX achieves a 25.62% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's -1.35% return. Over the past 10 years, VHCOX has outperformed XLV with an annualized return of 17.07%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.48% annualized return.


VHCOX

1D
0.15%
1M
12.04%
YTD
25.62%
6M
27.15%
1Y
55.65%
3Y*
26.86%
5Y*
14.44%
10Y*
17.07%

XLV

1D
3.07%
1M
4.67%
YTD
-1.35%
6M
-0.35%
1Y
16.13%
3Y*
6.92%
5Y*
6.19%
10Y*
9.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VHCOX vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VHCOX
Vanguard Capital Opportunity Fund Investor Shares
25.62%25.74%14.00%25.55%-17.61%20.85%22.73%27.20%-3.76%28.28%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
-1.35%14.50%2.47%2.07%-2.08%26.04%13.30%20.45%6.28%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between VHCOX and XLV is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 1998

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between VHCOX and XLV has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VHCOX vs. XLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VHCOX
XLV

Technology

33.1%

-

Healthcare

24.9%
100.0%

Industrials

10.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%

-

Financial Services

8.2%

-

Communication Services

6.5%

-

Energy

2.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.9%

-

Basic Materials

0.4%

-

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

VHCOX
33.1%
XLV

-

Healthcare

VHCOX
24.9%
XLV
100.0%

Industrials

VHCOX
10.7%
XLV

-

Consumer Cyclical

VHCOX
9.8%
XLV

-

Financial Services

VHCOX
8.2%
XLV

-

Communication Services

VHCOX
6.5%
XLV

-

Energy

VHCOX
2.2%
XLV

-

Consumer Defensive

VHCOX
0.9%
XLV

-

Basic Materials

VHCOX
0.4%
XLV

-

Real Estate

VHCOX
0.1%
XLV

-

Utilities

VHCOX

-

XLV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VHCOX vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VHCOX
VHCOX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
VHCOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHCOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHCOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
VHCOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHCOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

XLV
XLV Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VHCOX vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Capital Opportunity Fund Investor Shares (VHCOX) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VHCOXXLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.19

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.53

1.55

+2.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.34

3.73

+16.61

VHCOX vs. XLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VHCOX Sharpe Ratio is 3.32, which is higher than the XLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VHCOX and XLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VHCOXXLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.32

1.08

+2.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.42

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.57

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.46

+0.16

Drawdowns

VHCOX vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VHCOX drawdown since its inception was -54.76%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHCOX and XLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VHCOXXLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.76%

-39.17%

-15.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

-10.47%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.87%

-17.11%

-6.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.59%

-17.11%

-10.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.78%

-28.40%

-5.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.68%

+4.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.00%

-7.12%

-2.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

4.33%

-1.56%

Volatility

VHCOX vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Capital Opportunity Fund Investor Shares (VHCOX) has a higher volatility of 6.64% compared to State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) at 5.04%. This indicates that VHCOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VHCOXXLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.64%

5.04%

+1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.71%

10.67%

+3.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.99%

14.97%

+2.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.88%

14.76%

+5.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.34%

16.57%

+3.77%

VHCOX vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VHCOX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

VHCOX vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison

VHCOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.66%, more than XLV's 1.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VHCOX
Vanguard Capital Opportunity Fund Investor Shares
7.66%9.62%8.16%2.33%9.26%10.44%9.10%6.41%12.11%3.87%5.66%5.30%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.65%1.60%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.57%1.47%1.60%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


VHCOX and XLV have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VHCOX has higher volatility (6.64%) compared to XLV (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VHCOX dropped -54.76% vs XLV's -39.17%.

VHCOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VHCOX and XLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer