PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGSNX vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGSNX vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund Institutional Shares (VGSNX) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGSNX achieves a 7.95% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 10.85% return. Over the past 10 years, VGSNX has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 5.22%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.54% annualized return.


VGSNX

1D
0.44%
1M
-0.96%
YTD
7.95%
6M
6.90%
1Y
10.16%
3Y*
9.20%
5Y*
2.22%
10Y*
5.22%

IVV

1D
-0.76%
1M
4.97%
YTD
10.85%
6M
10.87%
1Y
28.00%
3Y*
22.43%
5Y*
13.88%
10Y*
15.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGSNX vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGSNX
Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund Institutional Shares
7.95%3.21%3.72%13.12%-26.19%40.46%-4.76%28.98%-5.97%4.90%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
10.85%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%

Correlation

The correlation between VGSNX and IVV is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2003

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between VGSNX and IVV has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VGSNX vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VGSNX
IVV

Real Estate

97.3%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.1%
1.8%

Communication Services

0.6%
11.2%

Technology

0.3%
35.6%

Energy

0.1%
3.5%

Financial Services

0.1%
11.8%

Industrials

0.0%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Real Estate

VGSNX
97.3%
IVV
1.9%

Basic Materials

VGSNX
1.1%
IVV
1.8%

Communication Services

VGSNX
0.6%
IVV
11.2%

Technology

VGSNX
0.3%
IVV
35.6%

Energy

VGSNX
0.1%
IVV
3.5%

Financial Services

VGSNX
0.1%
IVV
11.8%

Industrials

VGSNX
0.0%
IVV
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VGSNX

-

IVV
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

VGSNX

-

IVV
4.9%

Healthcare

VGSNX

-

IVV
8.5%

Utilities

VGSNX

-

IVV
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGSNX vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGSNX
VGSNX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
VGSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
VGSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGSNX vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund Institutional Shares (VGSNX) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VGSNXIVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.43

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

3.17

-1.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.75

14.71

-10.96

VGSNX vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGSNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGSNX and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VGSNXIVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

2.39

-1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.83

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.86

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.45

-0.18

Drawdowns

VGSNX vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGSNX drawdown since its inception was -73.06%, which is greater than IVV's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGSNX and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGSNXIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.06%

-55.25%

-17.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-8.89%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.41%

-18.75%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.39%

-24.53%

-9.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.30%

-33.90%

-8.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.52%

-0.76%

-2.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.29%

-10.78%

-2.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

1.91%

+0.73%

Volatility

VGSNX vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund Institutional Shares (VGSNX) has a higher volatility of 3.75% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 2.87%. This indicates that VGSNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGSNXIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

2.87%

+0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.32%

8.90%

+0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.16%

11.80%

+1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.87%

16.88%

+1.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.91%

18.05%

+2.86%

VGSNX vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGSNX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VGSNX vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

VGSNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, more than IVV's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.06%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%
VGSNX
Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund Institutional Shares
3.71%3.94%3.87%3.93%3.94%2.57%3.95%3.40%4.75%4.26%4.84%3.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGSNX and IVV have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGSNX has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to IVV (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGSNX dropped -73.06% vs IVV's -55.25%.

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGSNX and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer