VGPMX vs. DBP
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX) and Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund (DBP).
VGPMX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on May 23, 1984. DBP is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the DBIQ Optimum Yield Precious Metals Index Excess Return. It was launched on Jan 5, 2007.
Performance
VGPMX vs. DBP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VGPMX vs. DBP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGPMX Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund | 4.53% | 65.96% | 5.78% | 10.06% | 7.34% | 19.50% | 17.21% | 20.67% | -32.26% | 13.75% |
DBP Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund | 7.03% | 73.43% | 26.71% | 8.68% | -1.51% | -7.10% | 26.79% | 15.89% | -4.31% | 10.58% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGPMX achieves a 4.53% return, which is significantly lower than DBP's 7.03% return. Over the past 10 years, VGPMX has underperformed DBP with an annualized return of 12.39%, while DBP has yielded a comparatively higher 13.17% annualized return.
VGPMX
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -10.69%
- YTD
- 4.53%
- 6M
- 17.55%
- 1Y
- 57.21%
- 3Y*
- 24.25%
- 5Y*
- 19.13%
- 10Y*
- 12.39%
DBP
- 1D
- 4.37%
- 1M
- -13.22%
- YTD
- 7.03%
- 6M
- 26.77%
- 1Y
- 57.78%
- 3Y*
- 34.01%
- 5Y*
- 20.74%
- 10Y*
- 13.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VGPMX vs. DBP - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGPMX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than DBP's 0.78% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
VGPMX vs. DBP — Risk / Return Rank
VGPMX
DBP
VGPMX vs. DBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX) and Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund (DBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VGPMX | DBP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.94 | 1.76 | +1.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.51 | 2.08 | +1.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.33 | +0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.24 | 2.33 | +1.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.59 | 8.43 | +9.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VGPMX | DBP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.94 | 1.76 | +1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.12 | 1.01 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.71 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.45 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between VGPMX and DBP is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
VGPMX vs. DBP - Dividend Comparison
VGPMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, more than DBP's 2.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGPMX Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund | 3.73% | 2.59% | 2.68% | 3.22% | 3.27% | 3.26% | 2.03% | 2.39% | 3.02% | 0.02% | 1.72% | 2.32% |
DBP Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund | 2.28% | 2.44% | 4.21% | 4.47% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.26% | 1.24% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
VGPMX vs. DBP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGPMX drawdown since its inception was -78.85%, which is greater than DBP's maximum drawdown of -53.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGPMX and DBP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGPMX | DBP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.85% | -53.89% | -24.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.80% | -25.48% | +12.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.71% | -25.48% | +2.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.59% | -28.36% | -26.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.73% | -19.34% | +8.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.69% | -25.47% | -9.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 7.06% | -3.97% |
Volatility
VGPMX vs. DBP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX) is 7.56%, while Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund (DBP) has a volatility of 12.31%. This indicates that VGPMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VGPMX | DBP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.56% | 12.31% | -4.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.14% | 30.54% | -17.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.28% | 32.93% | -13.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.15% | 20.57% | -3.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.65% | 18.57% | +3.08% |