VGLT vs. TLH
VGLT (Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF) and TLH (iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - VGLT tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index while TLH tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury 10-20 Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VGLT returned -1.10%/yr vs -0.83%/yr for TLH. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VGLT charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TLH.
Performance
VGLT vs. TLH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGLT achieves a -0.41% return, which is significantly higher than TLH's -0.51% return. Over the past 10 years, VGLT has underperformed TLH with an annualized return of -1.10%, while TLH has yielded a comparatively higher -0.83% annualized return.
VGLT
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- -0.41%
- 6M
- -1.68%
- 1Y
- 5.25%
- 3Y*
- -0.72%
- 5Y*
- -5.30%
- 10Y*
- -1.10%
TLH
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- -0.51%
- 6M
- -1.42%
- 1Y
- 5.33%
- 3Y*
- 0.59%
- 5Y*
- -3.80%
- 10Y*
- -0.83%
VGLT vs. TLH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGLT Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF | -0.41% | 5.35% | -6.28% | 3.27% | -29.34% | -4.98% | 17.57% | 14.30% | -1.54% | 8.64% |
TLH iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF | -0.51% | 6.47% | -4.21% | 4.03% | -25.24% | -5.38% | 13.78% | 10.11% | 0.37% | 4.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGLT and TLH is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2009 | 0.97 |
The correlation between VGLT and TLH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGLT vs. TLH — Risk / Return Rank
VGLT
TLH
VGLT vs. TLH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) and iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VGLT | TLH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.12 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 0.82 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.96 | 2.28 | -0.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VGLT | TLH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 | 0.67 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.37 | -0.30 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.08 | -0.07 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.28 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
VGLT vs. TLH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGLT drawdown since its inception was -46.18%, which is greater than TLH's maximum drawdown of -41.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGLT and TLH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGLT | TLH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.18% | -41.14% | -5.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.01% | -6.50% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.68% | -15.35% | -2.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.98% | -35.41% | -5.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.18% | -41.14% | -5.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.83% | -29.82% | -7.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.06% | -10.76% | -4.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 2.35% | +0.33% |
Volatility
VGLT vs. TLH - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) has a higher volatility of 2.59% compared to iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH) at 2.46%. This indicates that VGLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGLT | TLH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.59% | 2.46% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.94% | 5.49% | +0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.88% | 8.01% | +0.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.58% | 12.70% | +1.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.81% | 11.19% | +2.62% |
VGLT vs. TLH - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGLT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than TLH's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VGLT vs. TLH - Dividend Comparison
VGLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, more than TLH's 4.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLH iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.48% | 4.17% | 4.28% | 3.83% | 2.78% | 1.50% | 2.65% | 2.31% | 2.17% | 1.83% | 1.91% | 2.13% |
VGLT Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF | 4.61% | 4.44% | 4.33% | 3.33% | 2.84% | 1.82% | 2.15% | 2.46% | 2.71% | 2.55% | 2.69% | 3.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, VGLT and TLH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VGLT has higher volatility (2.59%) compared to TLH (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGLT dropped -46.18% vs TLH's -41.14%.
On 10-year performance, TLH leads with -0.83% vs -1.10% for VGLT. On fees, VGLT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, TLH has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TLH has performed better with a -0.83% return vs -1.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGLT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for TLH.
VGLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.61%, compared with 4.48% for TLH.
VGLT tracks Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index, while TLH tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 10-20 Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VGLT and 0.15% for TLH.
TLH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VGLT and TLH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer