VGIT vs. BNDW
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW).
VGIT and BNDW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VGIT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. 3-10 Year Government Float Adjusted Index. It was launched on Nov 19, 2009. BNDW is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Float Adjusted TR Index. It was launched on Sep 4, 2018. Both VGIT and BNDW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VGIT or BNDW.
Key characteristics
| VGIT | BNDW | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 1.11% | 2.25% |
| 1Y Return | 5.17% | 7.45% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -1.83% | -1.51% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -0.24% | -0.11% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.93 | 1.47 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.37 | 2.18 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.16 | 1.26 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.35 | 0.54 |
| Martin Ratio | 2.83 | 5.25 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.63% | 1.34% |
| Daily Std Dev | 4.98% | 4.78% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.05% | -17.22% |
| Current Drawdown | -8.90% | -6.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGIT and BNDW is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VGIT vs. BNDW - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, VGIT achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly lower than BNDW's 2.25% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VGIT vs. BNDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGIT has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than BNDW's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VGIT vs. BNDW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VGIT vs. BNDW - Dividend Comparison
VGIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, less than BNDW's 4.16% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF | 3.58% | 2.72% | 1.74% | 1.69% | 2.23% | 2.24% | 2.05% | 1.67% | 1.69% | 1.69% | 1.54% | 1.63% |
BNDW Vanguard Total World Bond ETF | 4.16% | 3.73% | 2.02% | 2.58% | 1.56% | 3.05% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
VGIT vs. BNDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGIT drawdown since its inception was -16.05%, smaller than the maximum BNDW drawdown of -17.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGIT and BNDW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VGIT vs. BNDW - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) have volatilities of 1.22% and 1.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.