PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGHAX vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGHAX vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Health Care Fund Admiral Shares (VGHAX) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGHAX achieves a -4.65% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 31.64% return. Over the past 10 years, VGHAX has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 8.70%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.78% annualized return.


VGHAX

1D
-1.55%
1M
-1.39%
YTD
-4.65%
6M
-4.26%
1Y
16.26%
3Y*
8.39%
5Y*
7.23%
10Y*
8.70%

VGT

1D
-1.48%
1M
18.07%
YTD
31.64%
6M
30.51%
1Y
60.15%
3Y*
33.48%
5Y*
22.23%
10Y*
25.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGHAX vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGHAX
Vanguard Health Care Fund Admiral Shares
-4.65%19.72%9.10%5.51%-1.00%12.82%12.62%22.99%1.07%19.64%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
31.64%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between VGHAX and VGT is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between VGHAX and VGT has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VGHAX vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VGHAX
VGT

Healthcare

97.8%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%

-

Financial Services

0.0%
0.5%

Basic Materials

0.0%
0.0%

Communication Services

-

0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.1%

Energy

-

0.3%

Industrials

-

0.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

98.5%

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

VGHAX
97.8%
VGT
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

VGHAX
1.2%
VGT

-

Financial Services

VGHAX
0.0%
VGT
0.5%

Basic Materials

VGHAX
0.0%
VGT
0.0%

Communication Services

VGHAX

-

VGT
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VGHAX

-

VGT
0.1%

Energy

VGHAX

-

VGT
0.3%

Industrials

VGHAX

-

VGT
0.4%

Real Estate

VGHAX

-

VGT

-

Technology

VGHAX

-

VGT
98.5%

Utilities

VGHAX

-

VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGHAX vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGHAX
VGHAX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
VGHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
VGHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGHAX vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Health Care Fund Admiral Shares (VGHAX) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VGHAXVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.47

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

3.69

-1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.63

11.77

-7.15

VGHAX vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGHAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGHAX and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VGHAXVGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

2.95

-1.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.89

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

1.05

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.68

-0.08

Drawdowns

VGHAX vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGHAX drawdown since its inception was -36.85%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGHAX and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGHAXVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.85%

-54.63%

+17.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.19%

-16.40%

+7.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.05%

-27.23%

+11.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.92%

-35.07%

+18.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.17%

-35.07%

+7.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.60%

-1.48%

-6.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.61%

-7.95%

+2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

5.13%

-1.69%

Volatility

VGHAX vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Health Care Fund Admiral Shares (VGHAX) is 3.78%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that VGHAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGHAXVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

6.39%

-2.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.35%

16.07%

-5.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.74%

20.57%

-5.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.12%

25.18%

-7.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.58%

24.60%

-7.02%

VGHAX vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGHAX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VGHAX vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

VGHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.00%, more than VGT's 0.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGHAX
Vanguard Health Care Fund Admiral Shares
7.00%6.07%22.84%7.22%5.49%7.05%8.02%11.87%9.15%7.36%8.60%8.21%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.31%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGHAX and VGT have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to VGHAX (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGHAX dropped -36.85% vs VGT's -54.63%.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGHAX and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer