VGCAX vs. BNDW

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

VGCAX (Vanguard Global Credit Bond Fund Admiral Shares) and BNDW (Vanguard Total World Bond ETF) are both funds - VGCAX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Vanguard, while BNDW is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Float Adjusted Composite Index. Over the past 5 years, VGCAX returned 0.90%/yr vs -0.14%/yr for BNDW. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. VGCAX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for BNDW.

Performance

VGCAX vs. BNDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Global Credit Bond Fund Admiral Shares (VGCAX) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VGCAX having a 0.51% return and BNDW slightly lower at 0.50%.

VGCAX

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: -0.89%
• 6M: -0.06%
• YTD: 0.51%
• 1Y: 2.91%
• 3Y*: 5.93%
• 5Y*: 0.90%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.79%

BNDW

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: -0.39%
• 6M: 0.18%
• YTD: 0.50%
• 1Y: 1.88%
• 3Y*: 4.20%
• 5Y*: -0.14%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 1.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BNDW Vanguard Total World Bond ETF	$6.80M	$6.17M	$6.89M
VGCAX Vanguard Global Credit Bond Fund Admiral Shares	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

VGCAX vs. BNDW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
VGCAX Vanguard Global Credit Bond Fund Admiral Shares	0.51%	7.30%	3.99%	9.22%	-13.43%	-0.64%	10.81%	13.05%	0.96%
BNDW Vanguard Total World Bond ETF	0.50%	5.02%	2.42%	7.18%	-12.88%	-2.10%	6.22%	8.37%	1.94%

Correlation

The correlation between VGCAX and BNDW is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2018	0.92

The correlation between VGCAX and BNDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

VGCAX vs. BNDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VGCAX

VGCAX Risk / Return Rank: 22
VGCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
VGCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
VGCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
VGCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
VGCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

BNDW

BNDW Risk / Return Rank: 21
BNDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
BNDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
BNDW Omega Ratio Rank: 20
BNDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
BNDW Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VGCAX vs. BNDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Credit Bond Fund Admiral Shares (VGCAX) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VGCAX	BNDW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.94	0.56	+0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.35	0.80	+0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.10	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.06	0.70	+0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.31	1.68	+1.63

VGCAX vs. BNDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGCAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is higher than the BNDW Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGCAX and BNDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VGCAX vs. BNDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGCAX drawdown since its inception was -18.63%, which is greater than BNDW's maximum drawdown of -17.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGCAX and BNDW.

Drawdown Indicators

	VGCAX	BNDW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.63%	-17.22%	-1.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.90%	-2.70%	-0.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.54%	-3.57%	+0.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.52%	-16.74%	-1.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.25%	-1.46%	+0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.27%	-4.90%	+0.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.93%	1.12%	-0.19%

Volatility

VGCAX vs. BNDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Global Credit Bond Fund Admiral Shares (VGCAX) is 0.95%, while Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) has a volatility of 1.10%. This indicates that VGCAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VGCAX	BNDW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.95%	1.10%	-0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.76%	2.86%	-0.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.30%	3.37%	-0.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.08%	5.23%	-0.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.81%	4.88%	-0.07%

VGCAX vs. BNDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGCAX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDW's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VGCAX vs. BNDW - Dividend Comparison

VGCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, more than BNDW's 4.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BNDW Vanguard Total World Bond ETF	4.27%	4.12%	3.90%	3.73%	2.02%	2.58%	1.56%	3.05%	1.66%
VGCAX Vanguard Global Credit Bond Fund Admiral Shares	5.05%	4.91%	4.65%	4.48%	2.72%	3.16%	4.65%	6.88%	0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VGCAX and BNDW in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, VGCAX and BNDW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, VGCAX or BNDW?

BNDW has higher volatility (1.10%) compared to VGCAX (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGCAX dropped -18.63% vs BNDW's -17.22%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VGCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.