PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGAVX vs. LQD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGAVX vs. LQD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VGAVX) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGAVX achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly higher than LQD's 0.46% return. Over the past 10 years, VGAVX has outperformed LQD with an annualized return of 3.70%, while LQD has yielded a comparatively lower 2.52% annualized return.


VGAVX

1D
0.24%
1M
1.07%
YTD
1.65%
6M
1.95%
1Y
11.27%
3Y*
9.73%
5Y*
2.35%
10Y*
3.70%

LQD

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.72%
YTD
0.46%
6M
-0.03%
1Y
6.08%
3Y*
4.95%
5Y*
-0.04%
10Y*
2.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGAVX vs. LQD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGAVX
Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
1.65%12.98%6.27%10.44%-16.68%-1.74%5.82%14.01%-2.77%8.45%
LQD
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
0.46%7.90%0.86%9.40%-17.92%-1.84%10.97%17.37%-3.79%7.06%

Correlation

The correlation between VGAVX and LQD is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.53

The correlation between VGAVX and LQD shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (all time) to 0.72 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGAVX vs. LQD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGAVX
VGAVX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VGAVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGAVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGAVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
VGAVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGAVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

LQD
LQD Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
LQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQD Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
LQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQD Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGAVX vs. LQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VGAVX) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VGAVXLQDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.20

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

1.83

+1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.71

5.23

+6.49

VGAVX vs. LQD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGAVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is higher than the LQD Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGAVX and LQD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VGAVXLQDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82

1.14

+1.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

-0.01

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.29

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.54

+0.15

Drawdowns

VGAVX vs. LQD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGAVX drawdown since its inception was -26.77%, which is greater than LQD's maximum drawdown of -24.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGAVX and LQD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGAVXLQDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.77%

-24.95%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.97%

-3.34%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.11%

-8.43%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.77%

-24.95%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.77%

-24.95%

-1.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-3.72%

+3.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.68%

-3.99%

-0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

1.17%

-0.18%

Volatility

VGAVX vs. LQD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VGAVX) is 1.53%, while iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) has a volatility of 1.65%. This indicates that VGAVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGAVXLQDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.53%

1.65%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.32%

3.90%

-0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.12%

5.36%

-1.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.32%

8.65%

-2.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.37%

8.68%

-2.31%

VGAVX vs. LQD - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGAVX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than LQD's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VGAVX vs. LQD - Dividend Comparison

VGAVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.79%, more than LQD's 4.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LQD
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.57%4.48%4.45%3.99%3.30%2.30%2.66%3.29%3.67%3.10%3.34%3.47%
VGAVX
Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
5.79%5.88%6.56%5.50%5.29%4.27%4.20%4.60%4.54%4.62%4.73%4.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGAVX and LQD have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LQD has higher volatility (1.65%) compared to VGAVX (1.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGAVX dropped -26.77% vs LQD's -24.95%.

VGAVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGAVX and LQD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer