PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFVA vs. VOOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFVA vs. VOOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) and Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFVA achieves a 9.50% return, which is significantly higher than VOOV's 7.51% return.


VFVA

1D
-1.33%
1M
0.94%
YTD
9.50%
6M
10.40%
1Y
28.50%
3Y*
17.34%
5Y*
9.48%
10Y*

VOOV

1D
-0.40%
1M
2.22%
YTD
7.51%
6M
7.76%
1Y
21.33%
3Y*
15.68%
5Y*
10.64%
10Y*
11.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFVA vs. VOOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VFVA
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF
9.50%14.77%7.67%17.37%-3.96%36.94%2.28%25.42%-15.61%
VOOV
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
7.51%13.10%12.21%22.15%-5.37%24.87%1.23%31.75%-8.83%

Correlation

The correlation between VFVA and VOOV is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018

0.89

The correlation between VFVA and VOOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

VFVA vs. VOOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFVA
VOOV

Financial Services

25.7%
15.0%

Healthcare

14.9%
11.6%

Technology

14.5%
19.0%

Consumer Cyclical

13.1%
11.1%

Industrials

7.6%
11.0%

Energy

7.3%
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

7.1%
9.5%

Communication Services

6.2%
3.3%

Basic Materials

3.3%
3.5%

Real Estate

0.4%
3.4%

Utilities

-

4.6%

Financial Services

VFVA
25.7%
VOOV
15.0%

Healthcare

VFVA
14.9%
VOOV
11.6%

Technology

VFVA
14.5%
VOOV
19.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VFVA
13.1%
VOOV
11.1%

Industrials

VFVA
7.6%
VOOV
11.0%

Energy

VFVA
7.3%
VOOV
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

VFVA
7.1%
VOOV
9.5%

Communication Services

VFVA
6.2%
VOOV
3.3%

Basic Materials

VFVA
3.3%
VOOV
3.5%

Real Estate

VFVA
0.4%
VOOV
3.4%

Utilities

VFVA

-

VOOV
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFVA vs. VOOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFVA
VFVA Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VFVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFVA Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
VFVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFVA Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

VOOV
VOOV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VOOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOV Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFVA vs. VOOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) and Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFVAVOOVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.87

2.18

-0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.76

3.04

-0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.39

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

3.42

-0.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.61

13.04

-2.43

VFVA vs. VOOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFVA Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the VOOV Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFVA and VOOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFVAVOOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

2.18

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.74

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.75

-0.32

Drawdowns

VFVA vs. VOOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFVA drawdown since its inception was -48.58%, which is greater than VOOV's maximum drawdown of -37.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFVA and VOOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFVAVOOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.58%

-37.31%

-11.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.55%

-6.27%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.07%

-17.55%

-6.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.07%

-18.10%

-5.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.51%

-0.52%

-0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.31%

-3.84%

-3.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

1.64%

+1.05%

Volatility

VFVA vs. VOOV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) has a higher volatility of 3.36% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) at 2.01%. This indicates that VFVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFVAVOOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

2.01%

+1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.81%

7.06%

+2.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.35%

9.83%

+5.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.18%

14.45%

+5.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.32%

16.95%

+7.37%

VFVA vs. VOOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFVA has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than VOOV's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFVA vs. VOOV - Dividend Comparison

VFVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, more than VOOV's 1.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VFVA
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF
1.95%2.13%2.40%2.45%2.21%1.68%2.04%2.08%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOOV
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
1.68%1.76%2.10%1.69%2.19%1.87%2.45%2.10%2.65%2.13%2.24%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFVA and VOOV have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VFVA has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to VOOV (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFVA dropped -48.58% vs VOOV's -37.31%.

On 5-year performance, VOOV leads with 10.64% vs 9.48% for VFVA. On fees, VOOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VOOV has been the lower-risk option at 2.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VOOV has performed better with a 10.64% return vs 9.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for VFVA.

VFVA has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 1.68% for VOOV.

VFVA is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VOOV is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VFVA and 0.10% for VOOV.

VOOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFVA and VOOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer