PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFSAX vs. FNDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFSAX vs. FNDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap Index Fund Admiral Shares (VFSAX) and Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VFSAX having a 11.72% return and FNDC slightly lower at 11.36%.


VFSAX

1D
0.05%
1M
1.80%
YTD
11.72%
6M
14.53%
1Y
28.52%
3Y*
17.12%
5Y*
6.13%
10Y*

FNDC

1D
-0.64%
1M
1.12%
YTD
11.36%
6M
13.51%
1Y
27.62%
3Y*
18.14%
5Y*
7.17%
10Y*
8.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFSAX vs. FNDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VFSAX
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap Index Fund Admiral Shares
11.72%29.89%2.58%15.13%-21.30%12.68%11.90%13.47%
FNDC
Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF
11.36%35.65%1.38%14.92%-14.71%10.26%6.58%12.82%

Correlation

The correlation between VFSAX and FNDC is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2019

0.94

The correlation between VFSAX and FNDC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

VFSAX vs. FNDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFSAX
FNDC

Industrials

18.7%
25.8%

Technology

13.3%
8.7%

Basic Materials

12.1%
11.0%

Financial Services

10.8%
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
12.8%

Real Estate

7.3%
6.9%

Healthcare

6.2%
4.9%

Energy

4.9%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
6.3%

Utilities

2.5%
2.8%

Communication Services

2.3%
4.8%

Industrials

VFSAX
18.7%
FNDC
25.8%

Technology

VFSAX
13.3%
FNDC
8.7%

Basic Materials

VFSAX
12.1%
FNDC
11.0%

Financial Services

VFSAX
10.8%
FNDC
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VFSAX
9.3%
FNDC
12.8%

Real Estate

VFSAX
7.3%
FNDC
6.9%

Healthcare

VFSAX
6.2%
FNDC
4.9%

Energy

VFSAX
4.9%
FNDC
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

VFSAX
3.4%
FNDC
6.3%

Utilities

VFSAX
2.5%
FNDC
2.8%

Communication Services

VFSAX
2.3%
FNDC
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFSAX vs. FNDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFSAX
VFSAX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
VFSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VFSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDC
FNDC Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FNDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDC Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDC Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFSAX vs. FNDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap Index Fund Admiral Shares (VFSAX) and Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFSAXFNDCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.35

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

2.48

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.44

9.29

+0.15

VFSAX vs. FNDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFSAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the FNDC Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFSAX and FNDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFSAXFNDCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

1.95

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.45

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.50

+0.06

Drawdowns

VFSAX vs. FNDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFSAX drawdown since its inception was -39.86%, smaller than the maximum FNDC drawdown of -43.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFSAX and FNDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFSAXFNDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.86%

-43.22%

+3.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.48%

-11.20%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.73%

-12.98%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.81%

-32.13%

-1.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

-2.09%

+1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.26%

-8.45%

-0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

2.98%

0.00%

Volatility

VFSAX vs. FNDC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap Index Fund Admiral Shares (VFSAX) is 4.31%, while Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that VFSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFSAXFNDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

4.67%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.18%

11.77%

-0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.39%

14.26%

-0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.04%

15.98%

-0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.03%

16.80%

+0.23%

VFSAX vs. FNDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFSAX has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDC's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

VFSAX vs. FNDC - Dividend Comparison

VFSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, less than FNDC's 3.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDC
Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF
3.46%3.86%3.59%2.86%1.98%2.58%1.77%2.71%2.68%1.94%1.95%1.30%
VFSAX
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap Index Fund Admiral Shares
2.96%3.31%3.36%3.06%2.22%2.67%1.85%3.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, VFSAX and FNDC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FNDC has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to VFSAX (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFSAX dropped -39.86% vs FNDC's -43.22%.

VFSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFSAX and FNDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer