VFQY vs. IVV
VFQY (Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VFQY is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. VFQY is actively managed, while IVV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VFQY returned 8.39%/yr vs 13.13%/yr for IVV. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VFQY charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
VFQY vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VFQY having a 8.55% return and IVV slightly lower at 8.20%.
VFQY
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 1.91%
- YTD
- 8.55%
- 6M
- 6.89%
- 1Y
- 19.65%
- 3Y*
- 16.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.39%
- 10Y*
- —
IVV
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 8.20%
- 6M
- 7.25%
- 1Y
- 23.72%
- 3Y*
- 20.79%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 15.58%
VFQY vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFQY Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 8.55% | 10.24% | 12.93% | 22.48% | -15.74% | 27.96% | 16.97% | 25.75% | -8.19% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 8.20% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -5.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFQY and IVV is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018 | 0.87 |
The correlation between VFQY and IVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VFQY vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VFQY
IVV
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
VFQY
IVV
Financial Services
VFQY
IVV
Industrials
VFQY
IVV
Consumer Cyclical
VFQY
IVV
Consumer Defensive
VFQY
IVV
Healthcare
VFQY
IVV
Communication Services
VFQY
IVV
Basic Materials
VFQY
IVV
Energy
VFQY
IVV
Real Estate
VFQY
-
IVV
Utilities
VFQY
-
IVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFQY vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
VFQY
IVV
VFQY vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF (VFQY) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VFQY | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.35 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 2.68 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.04 | 11.98 | -3.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VFQY vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFQY drawdown since its inception was -37.41%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFQY and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFQY | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.41% | -55.25% | +17.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.12% | -8.89% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.67% | -18.75% | -1.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.93% | -24.53% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.29% | -3.14% | +1.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.65% | -10.76% | +4.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.45% | 1.99% | +0.46% |
Volatility
VFQY vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF (VFQY) is 3.79%, while iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a volatility of 4.88%. This indicates that VFQY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFQY | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.79% | 4.88% | -1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.84% | 9.85% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.61% | 12.48% | +1.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.36% | 16.98% | +1.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.84% | 18.07% | +2.77% |
VFQY vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFQY has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VFQY vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
VFQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than IVV's 1.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.11% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
VFQY Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 0.82% | 1.17% | 1.34% | 1.38% | 1.43% | 0.98% | 1.22% | 1.34% | 1.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFQY and IVV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVV has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to VFQY (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFQY dropped -37.41% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 5-year performance, IVV leads with 13.13% vs 8.39% for VFQY. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VFQY has been the lower-risk option at 3.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IVV has performed better with a 13.13% return vs 8.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for VFQY.
IVV has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.82% for VFQY.
VFQY is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VFQY and 0.03% for IVV.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VFQY and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer