PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFMO vs. VCEB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFMO vs. VCEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) and Vanguard ESG U.S. Corporate Bond ETF (VCEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFMO achieves a 28.14% return, which is significantly higher than VCEB's 0.98% return.


VFMO

1D
2.05%
1M
4.29%
YTD
28.14%
6M
24.50%
1Y
46.44%
3Y*
28.85%
5Y*
14.38%
10Y*

VCEB

1D
0.09%
1M
0.87%
YTD
0.98%
6M
0.75%
1Y
4.71%
3Y*
5.19%
5Y*
0.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFMO vs. VCEB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VFMO
Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
28.14%17.39%26.14%16.25%-12.84%19.16%24.56%
VCEB
Vanguard ESG U.S. Corporate Bond ETF
0.98%7.48%2.23%8.52%-15.15%-1.99%2.45%

Correlation

The correlation between VFMO and VCEB is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020

0.25

The correlation between VFMO and VCEB shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFMO vs. VCEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFMO
VFMO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VFMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFMO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VFMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

VCEB
VCEB Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
VCEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCEB Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
VCEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCEB Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFMO vs. VCEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) and Vanguard ESG U.S. Corporate Bond ETF (VCEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VFMOVCEBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.20

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.25

1.68

+2.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.78

5.04

+10.75

VFMO vs. VCEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the VCEB Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFMO and VCEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VFMO vs. VCEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFMO drawdown since its inception was -36.77%, which is greater than VCEB's maximum drawdown of -21.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMO and VCEB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFMOVCEBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.77%

-21.60%

-15.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.98%

-2.82%

-8.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.40%

-6.09%

-18.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.80%

-21.39%

-4.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-0.40%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.72%

-7.56%

-0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

0.94%

+2.01%

Volatility

VFMO vs. VCEB - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) has a higher volatility of 8.30% compared to Vanguard ESG U.S. Corporate Bond ETF (VCEB) at 1.21%. This indicates that VFMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFMOVCEBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.30%

1.21%

+7.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.41%

3.23%

+14.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.36%

4.19%

+18.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.91%

6.84%

+15.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.64%

6.64%

+17.00%

VFMO vs. VCEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than VCEB's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFMO vs. VCEB - Dividend Comparison

VFMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than VCEB's 4.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
VCEB
Vanguard ESG U.S. Corporate Bond ETF
4.62%4.57%4.47%3.70%2.84%1.69%0.43%0.00%0.00%
VFMO
Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
0.57%0.82%0.72%0.89%1.72%0.81%0.45%1.22%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFMO and VCEB have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VFMO has higher volatility (8.30%) compared to VCEB (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFMO dropped -36.77% vs VCEB's -21.60%.

On 5-year performance, VFMO leads with 14.38% vs 0.49% for VCEB. On fees, VCEB is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, VCEB has been the lower-risk option at 1.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VFMO has performed better with a 14.38% return vs 0.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCEB is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for VFMO.

VCEB has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 0.57% for VFMO.

VFMO is categorized as Momentum, while VCEB is Corporate Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VFMO and 0.12% for VCEB.

VFMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFMO and VCEB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer