PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFLO vs. QMOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFLO vs. QMOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFLO achieves a 20.78% return, which is significantly lower than QMOM's 24.29% return.


VFLO

1D
0.57%
1M
10.20%
YTD
20.78%
6M
21.57%
1Y
39.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QMOM

1D
-0.29%
1M
4.40%
YTD
24.29%
6M
24.93%
1Y
30.10%
3Y*
23.16%
5Y*
11.48%
10Y*
13.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFLO vs. QMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VFLO
Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF
20.78%17.51%21.83%14.59%
QMOM
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF
24.29%2.36%30.43%10.62%

Correlation

The correlation between VFLO and QMOM is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2023

0.57

The correlation between VFLO and QMOM shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VFLO vs. QMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFLO
QMOM

Technology

38.4%
23.9%

Healthcare

17.9%
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

17.2%
7.4%

Energy

12.2%
5.5%

Communication Services

4.7%
4.2%

Basic Materials

4.3%
9.0%

Industrials

3.4%
37.5%

Utilities

1.7%
2.0%

Financial Services

0.0%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
1.6%

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Technology

VFLO
38.4%
QMOM
23.9%

Healthcare

VFLO
17.9%
QMOM
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VFLO
17.2%
QMOM
7.4%

Energy

VFLO
12.2%
QMOM
5.5%

Communication Services

VFLO
4.7%
QMOM
4.2%

Basic Materials

VFLO
4.3%
QMOM
9.0%

Industrials

VFLO
3.4%
QMOM
37.5%

Utilities

VFLO
1.7%
QMOM
2.0%

Financial Services

VFLO
0.0%
QMOM
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

VFLO
0.0%
QMOM
1.6%

Real Estate

VFLO
0.0%
QMOM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFLO vs. QMOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFLO
VFLO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
VFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
VFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

QMOM
QMOM Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
QMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
QMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFLO vs. QMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFLOQMOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.24

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.00

2.39

+5.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.33

8.74

+15.59

VFLO vs. QMOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFLO Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the QMOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFLO and QMOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFLOQMOMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

1.30

+1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.65

0.51

+1.13

Drawdowns

VFLO vs. QMOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFLO drawdown since its inception was -17.79%, smaller than the maximum QMOM drawdown of -39.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFLO and QMOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFLOQMOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.79%

-39.13%

+21.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.98%

-12.65%

+7.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.52%

-0.66%

-0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.42%

-12.91%

+10.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

3.45%

-1.82%

Volatility

VFLO vs. QMOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) is 6.02%, while Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) has a volatility of 8.27%. This indicates that VFLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFLOQMOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.02%

8.27%

-2.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.05%

19.79%

-8.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.98%

23.30%

-8.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.93%

24.19%

-8.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.93%

26.48%

-10.55%

VFLO vs. QMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFLO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than QMOM's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

VFLO vs. QMOM - Dividend Comparison

VFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than QMOM's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
QMOM
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF
0.44%0.54%1.40%0.87%1.59%0.12%0.08%0.01%0.05%0.13%0.34%
VFLO
Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF
1.18%1.60%1.20%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFLO and QMOM have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QMOM has higher volatility (8.27%) compared to VFLO (6.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFLO dropped -17.79% vs QMOM's -39.13%.

On 1-year performance, VFLO leads with 39.65% vs 30.10% for QMOM. On fees, QMOM is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, VFLO has been the lower-risk option at 6.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VFLO has performed better with a 39.65% return vs 30.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QMOM is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for VFLO.

VFLO has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.44% for QMOM.

VFLO is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while QMOM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Victory and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for VFLO and 0.28% for QMOM.

VFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFLO and QMOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer