PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
VFC vs. XLB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between VFC and XLB is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

VFC vs. XLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in V.F. Corporation (VFC) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
52.12%
-2.91%
VFC
XLB

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

VFC:

0.91

XLB:

0.68

Sortino Ratio

VFC:

1.77

XLB:

1.01

Omega Ratio

VFC:

1.21

XLB:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

VFC:

0.59

XLB:

0.65

Martin Ratio

VFC:

3.37

XLB:

1.92

Ulcer Index

VFC:

15.02%

XLB:

4.87%

Daily Std Dev

VFC:

55.85%

XLB:

13.84%

Max Drawdown

VFC:

-86.04%

XLB:

-59.83%

Current Drawdown

VFC:

-69.72%

XLB:

-8.78%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFC achieves a 19.11% return, which is significantly higher than XLB's 5.30% return. Over the past 10 years, VFC has underperformed XLB with an annualized return of -6.28%, while XLB has yielded a comparatively higher 8.58% annualized return.


VFC

YTD

19.11%

1M

19.38%

6M

52.12%

1Y

51.68%

5Y*

-18.28%

10Y*

-6.28%

XLB

YTD

5.30%

1M

5.73%

6M

-2.91%

1Y

8.30%

5Y*

11.27%

10Y*

8.58%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

VFC vs. XLB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VFC is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VFC is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VFC is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VFC is 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VFC is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VFC is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

XLB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLB is 2727
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLB is 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLB is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLB is 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLB is 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLB is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

VFC vs. XLB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for V.F. Corporation (VFC) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VFC, currently valued at 0.91, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.000.910.68
The chart of Sortino ratio for VFC, currently valued at 1.77, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.771.01
The chart of Omega ratio for VFC, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.211.12
The chart of Calmar ratio for VFC, currently valued at 0.59, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.590.65
The chart of Martin ratio for VFC, currently valued at 3.37, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.003.371.92
VFC
XLB

The current VFC Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is higher than the XLB Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFC and XLB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.91
0.68
VFC
XLB

Dividends

VFC vs. XLB - Dividend Comparison

VFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, less than XLB's 1.82% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
VFC
V.F. Corporation
1.41%1.68%5.27%7.28%2.69%2.26%1.91%2.65%2.33%2.87%2.14%1.48%
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.82%1.92%2.00%2.26%1.62%1.72%1.98%2.20%1.66%1.95%2.24%1.97%

Drawdowns

VFC vs. XLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFC drawdown since its inception was -86.04%, which is greater than XLB's maximum drawdown of -59.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFC and XLB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-69.72%
-8.78%
VFC
XLB

Volatility

VFC vs. XLB - Volatility Comparison

V.F. Corporation (VFC) has a higher volatility of 10.23% compared to Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) at 4.08%. This indicates that VFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
10.23%
4.08%
VFC
XLB
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab